Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 22;5(2):e01269. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01269

Table 1.

Comparison between operational challenges in continuous SCWG and SCWO reactors.

Challenge Supercritical water gasification Supercritical water oxidation
Destruction of refractory compounds High reaction temperatures and long residence times needed, high potential to form char [7] Oxygen free-radicals facilitate efficient destruction, less potential to polymerize molecules and form char [16]
Fuel value recovery Reductive reactions allow for recovery of feedstock fuel value in gaseous form [1, 3, 6] Oxidative reactions consume feedstock fuel value in favor of compound destruction [14, 16]
Reactor thermal management Endothermic reactions necessitate additional heater(s) to maintain isothermal conditions Cooling system or sand bath needed to prevent thermal runaway during exothermic reactions
Corrosion Heteroatoms and salts are highly corrosive [13, 14] Heteroatoms and salts are highly corrosive, oxide layer forms on metal reactor walls [13, 14]
Clogging Char formation likely from complex organic feedstocks, salt precipitation and metal oxide formation commonly causes clogging [1, 7] Salt precipitation and metal oxide formation commonly causes clogging [16]
Process economics >20% solid content and efficient heat recovery needed for cost-effective fuel gas production [3, 11, 13] Regenerative heating minimizes need for external energy input
Practical application Fuel gas production from wet organic wastes (e.g. sewage, biomass) [3, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12] Destruction and removal of toxic compounds (e.g. sewage, CWAs) [14]