Table 1.
Comparison between operational challenges in continuous SCWG and SCWO reactors.
| Challenge | Supercritical water gasification | Supercritical water oxidation |
|---|---|---|
| Destruction of refractory compounds | High reaction temperatures and long residence times needed, high potential to form char [7] | Oxygen free-radicals facilitate efficient destruction, less potential to polymerize molecules and form char [16] |
| Fuel value recovery | Reductive reactions allow for recovery of feedstock fuel value in gaseous form [1, 3, 6] | Oxidative reactions consume feedstock fuel value in favor of compound destruction [14, 16] |
| Reactor thermal management | Endothermic reactions necessitate additional heater(s) to maintain isothermal conditions | Cooling system or sand bath needed to prevent thermal runaway during exothermic reactions |
| Corrosion | Heteroatoms and salts are highly corrosive [13, 14] | Heteroatoms and salts are highly corrosive, oxide layer forms on metal reactor walls [13, 14] |
| Clogging | Char formation likely from complex organic feedstocks, salt precipitation and metal oxide formation commonly causes clogging [1, 7] | Salt precipitation and metal oxide formation commonly causes clogging [16] |
| Process economics | >20% solid content and efficient heat recovery needed for cost-effective fuel gas production [3, 11, 13] | Regenerative heating minimizes need for external energy input |
| Practical application | Fuel gas production from wet organic wastes (e.g. sewage, biomass) [3, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12] | Destruction and removal of toxic compounds (e.g. sewage, CWAs) [14] |