Table 2. Summary of QTLs for scent compounds detected with IM in the HW progeny.
QTL | Compound and Yeara | QTL Characteristics | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTb | LGc | LOD Scored | Positione | MMf | r2g | ||
1 | E-2-Hexenal Y1 | 2.5 | A4 | 4.8 | 16.2 | RoCol2 | 25.1 |
E-2-Hexenal Y2 | 2.9 | A4 | 6.1 | 17.5 | – | 41.0 | |
E-2-Hexenal Y3 | 2.7 | A4 | 4.6 | 17.5 | – | 28.0 | |
2 | E-2-Hexenal Y1 | 2.6 | B5 | 2.7 | 75.5 | H22F01 | 15.0 |
3 | Z-3-Hexenol Y2 | 2.7 | A4 | 5.9 | 16.5 | – | 40.0 |
Z-3-Hexenol Y3 | 2.5 | A4 | 4.4 | 16.5 | – | 27.2 | |
4 | 2PE Y1 | 2.5 | B6 | 16.8 | 61.3 | RhPAAS | 63.3 |
2PE Y2 | 3.1 | B6 | 7.7 | 64.6 | Rw61F2 | 48.8 | |
2PE Y3 | 2.7 | B6 | 13.1 | 61.3 | RhPAAS | 62.6 | |
5 | 2-Phenylacetaldehyde Y1 | 2.6 | B6 | 6.3 | 67.5 | – | 31.8 |
6 | 2-Phenylethyl acetate Y2 | 2.6 | B6 | 3.6 | 65.5 | – | 27.1 |
2-Phenylethyl acetate Y3 | 2.6 | B6 | 6.1 | 60.0 | – | 36.7 | |
7 | DMT Y3 | 2.6 | A3 | 3.3 | 34.6 | Fro9 | 21.3 |
8 | DMT Y1 | 2.7 | A5 | 3.1 | 8.0 | – | 17.9 |
9 | DMT Y1 | 2.7 | B5 | 4.2 | 16.0 | – | 23.4 |
10 | Benzyl alcohol Y1 | 2.8 | B5 | 5.4 | 16.0 | – | 29.0 |
11 | Benzyl alcohol Y2 | 3.0 | B6 | 4.0 | 64.6 | Rw61F2 | 29.5 |
Benzyl alcohol Y3 | 2.6 | B6 | 5.4 | 58.9 | – | 33.3 | |
12 | Geraniol Y1 | 2.6 | B5 | 2.7 | 27.3 | EIM3.05 | 15.1 |
13 | Geraniol Y1 | 2.6 | B7 | 4.4 | 19.8 | Rw5G14 | 23.6 |
Geraniol Y2 | 2.8 | B7 | 3.2 | 22.8 | – | 24.8 | |
14 | Geranyl acetate Y1 | 2.4 | B2 | 3.8 | 19.0 | H09B01f | 19.1 |
15 | Germacrene D Y1 | 2.5 | B5 | 3.5 | 28.3 | – | 18.8 |
16 | E-β-Farnesene Y1 | 2.6 | B7 | 6.6 | 19.8 | Rw5G14 | 33.4 |
17 | Farnesal Y3 | 2.8 | A1 | 3.2 | 45.1 | RMS070 | 20.6 |
18 | Farnesal Y1 | 2.6 | B7 | 6.2 | 19.8 | Rw5G14 | 31.8 |
19 | E,E-Farnesol Y2 | 2.6 | B2 | 3.1 | 64.0 | – | 25.3 |
20 | E,E-Farnesol Y1 | 2.8 | B7 | 11.0 | 19.7 | – | 49.2 |
E,E-Farnesol Y2 | 2.6 | B7 | 5.7 | 18.8 | RwIF9 | 39.3 | |
21 | E,E-Farnesol Y3 | 2.7 | B7 | 3.4 | 54.2 | RoAP1a | 21.5 |
22 | Dihydro-β-ionone Y1 | 2.6 | A4 | 2.8 | 27.7 | – | 19.2 |
23 | Dihydro-β-ionone Y1 | 2.6 | B6 | 4.1 | 41.8 | – | 22.7 |
24 | Dihydro-β-ionol Y2 | 2.5 | A5 | 3.0 | 31.8 | RhAB38 | 22.7 |
Dihydro-β-ionol Y3 | 2.5 | A5 | 3.6 | 31.8 | RhAB38 | 23.0 |
Name of the scent compound and year (Y).
The threshold of the LOD score was defined by a permutation test (PT).
LGs are as follows: A, female map; B, male map.
QTLs with a LOD higher than the threshold LOD were considered.
Position on the linkage group (cM).
Closest molecular marker (MM) associated.
Percentage of explanation r2.