Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 13;2019:9359807. doi: 10.1155/2019/9359807

Table 2.

Comparison of outcome measures between MBTs and inactive control conditions.

Sleep parameters Studies SMDs (95% CI) p-value I2 p-value
(n) (overall effect) Value (%) (heterogeneity)
PSQI 24 -0.58 (-0.79, -0.36) <0.001 85.6% <0.001
 Meditation 5 -1.06 (-1.96, -0.17) 0.020 93.1% <0.001
 Tai Chi 4 -0.55 (-1.23, 0.13) 0.116 87.7% <0.001
 Qigong 4 -0.61 (-1.20, -0.03) 0.039 87.1% <0.001
 Yoga 10 -0.39 (-0.59, -0.18) <0.001 65.6% 0.002
ISI 5 -0.36 (-0.56, -0.15) 0.001 0.00% 0.838
Objective-SE 3 0.20 (-0.13, 0.52) 0.232 51.4% 0.041
Objective-SOL 4 -0.03 (-0.20, 0.14) 0.728 0.0% 0.513
Objective-TST 3 0.19 (-0.07, 0.45) 0.156 0.0% 0.419
Objective-WASO 4 0.07 (-0.50, 0.63) 0.816 87.3% <0.001
Self-reported-SE 1 0.67 (-0.18, 1.52) 0.123
Self-reported-SOL 3 -0.44 (-0.77, -0.11) 0.008 7.0% 0.341
Self-reported-TST 3 0.49 (-0.11, 1.09) 0.106 64.8% 0.058
Self-reported-WASO 1 -0.47 (-1.31,0.37) 0.270

Note. Bold data indicate significant effect size.