Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 28;19:56. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1051-0

Table 2.

Comparison of NT-proBNP levels, CHADS2, CHA2DS2VASC, and model based on NT-proBNP levels in the evaluation of all-cause mortality

C-statistic 95% CI P Z P
NT-proBNP levels 0.77 0.70–0.85 < 0.001
CHADS2 0.64 0.55–0.73 0.002 2.47 0.013a
CHA2DS2VASC 0.63 0.55–0.72 0.045 2.62 0.009b
CHADS2 + NT-proBNP levels 0.78 0.71–0.85 < 0.001 3.63 < 0.001c
CHA2DS2VASC + NT-proBNP levels 0.78 0.70–0.85 < 0.001 3.31 < 0.001d
Model based on NT-proBNP levels 0.89 0.84–0.94 < 0.001 5.25 < 0.001e
5.31 < 0.001f
3.02 0.003g
3.30 0.001h

Notes: aP value was drawn from comparison between CHADS2 and NT-proBNP levels; bP value was drawn from comparison between CHA2DS2VASC and NT-proBNP levels; cP value was drawn from comparison between CHADS2 + NT-proBNP levels and CHADS2; dP value was drawn from comparison between CHA2DS2VASC + NT-proBNP levels and CHA2DS2VASC; eP value was drawn from comparison of model based on NT-proBNP levels with CHADS2; fP value was drawn from comparison of model based on NT-proBNP levels with CHA2DS2VASC; gP value was drawn from comparison of model based on NT-proBNP levels with CHA2DS2 + NT-proBNP levels; hP value was drawn from comparison of model based on NT-proBNP levels with CHA2DS2VASC + NT-proBNP levels

Abbreviations: NT-proBNP N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, CI confidence interval