Table 2.
MIC Breakpoint (mg/L) | PA14 SurA | ID72 SurA | PA14 BamB | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S ≤ | R > | PA14 WT | PA14 surA | PA14 surA SurA+ | ID72 | ID72 surA | ID72 surA SurA+ | PA14 WT | PA14 bamB | PA14 bamB BamB+ | |||
Penicillins | AMS | Ampicillin-sulbactam | – | – | >256 | 24 | >256 | >256 | >256 | >256 | >256 | 32 | >256 |
PIT | Piperacillin-tazobactam | 16 | 16 | 6 | 3 | 6 | >256 | <256 | >256 | 6 | 2 | 6 | |
TIL | Ticarcillin-clavulanate | 16 | 16 | 32 | 6 | 24 | >256 | 64 | >256 | 32 | 12 | 192 | |
Carbapenems | DOR | Doripenem | 1 | 2 | 0.25 | 0.38 | 0.38 | >32 | >32 | >32 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.5 |
MER | Meropenem | 2 | 8 | 0.38 | 0.75 | 0.5 | >32 | >32 | >32 | 0.38 | 0.5 | 1.5 | |
Cephalosporins | CTA | Cefotaxime | – | – | 16 | 8 | 16 | >256 | >256 | >256 | 16 | 8 | 32 |
CEP | Cefepime | 8 | 8 | 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.75 | >32 | 3 | > 32 | 0.75 | 0.38 | 0.5 | |
CTZ | Ceftazidime | 8 | 8 | 2 | 0.5 | 1 | >256 | 8 | 64 | 2 | 0.38 | 1.5 | |
Fluoroquinolones | LEV | Levofloxacin | 1 | 1 | 0.38 | 0.094 | 0.38 | 1.5 | 0.064 | 0.75 | 0.38 | 0.25 | 0.38 |
CIP | Ciprofloxacin | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.19 | 0.038 | 0.094 | 0.38 | 0.064 | 0.125 | 0.19 | 0.064 | 0.19 | |
FOS | Fosfomycin | – | – | 64 | 24 | 64 | 64 | 16 | 64 | 64 | 12 | 8 | |
VAN | Vancomycin | – | – | >256 | 12 | >256 | >256 | 64 | >256 | >256 | 48 | <256 | |
ERY | Erythromycin | – | – | >256 | >256 | >256 | >256 | >256 | >256 | >256 | 96 | <256 | |
TRS | Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole | – | – | 4 | 1.5 | 3 | >32 | >32 | >32 | 4 | 2 | 8 |
The following strains were investigated for antibiotic sensitivity: PA14 WT, a conditional surA mutant grown in the absence (surA) and the presence of 0.2% arabinose (surA SurA+), the bamB deletion mutant (bamB) and a conditional bamB deletion mutant grown in the presence of 0.2% arabinose (bamB BamB+). Reduction of MIC values compared to WT is marked in red. Bold face indicates reduction of MIC values below the breakpoint.