. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 28.

Published in final edited form as: Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015 Feb 9;50(5):628–636. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2014.323

Table 1:

Comparative analysis of current retrospective studies of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) and myeloablative conditioning (MAC) allo-SCT for myelofibrosis (MF) patients

Reference	N	Years	Preparative regimen	Median age (range)	OS	GVHD	NRM	Relapse
Guardiola et al.¹⁴	55	1979–1997	MAC (TBI, 63%)	42 (4–53)	5 years, 47%	aGVHD, 60% cGVHD, 60%	27%	18%
Kerbauy et al.¹⁵	104	1990–2005	MAC, 95; RIC, 9	49 (18–70)	2 years, 70%; 5 years, 61%	aGVHD, 64% cGVHD, 84%	32%	10.5%
Abelsson et al.¹⁶	92	1982–2009	MAC, 40; RIC, 52	46 MAC 55 RIC	2 years, 55%/75%; 5 years, 49%/59%	aGVHD, 75% MAC 28% RIC	32% 24%	10%
Nivison-Smith et al.¹⁷	57	1993–2005	MAC, 40; RIC, 17	47 (16–71)	2 years, 59%/66%; 5 years, 58%	aGVHD, 37%	25%	12%
Kroger et al.¹⁹	103	2002–2007	RIC, all (BU/Flu)	55 (32–68)	5 years, 67%	aGVHD, 27% cGVHD, 49%	19%	29%
Gupta et al.²⁰	233	1997–2010	RIC, all	55 (19–79)	5 years, 47%	aGVHD, 37% (day 100) cGVHD-42%	18%	43%