Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 19;19(6):1–199.

Table 2:

Summary of Results of Included Systematic Reviews for Mild to Moderate Major Depression

Author, Year No. of Studies/No. of Participants Results Quality Assessment
Guided internet-deliverd CBT compared with waiting list
Symptoms and Response to Treatment
Arnberg et al, 201420 5 RCTs/159 SMD = 0.83 (95% CI 0.59–1.07) GRADE: ⊕⊕⊕ moderate
Internet-delivered CBT compared with weekly telephone calls
Symptoms and Response to Treatment
Kaltenthaler et al, 200822 1 RCT/525 SMD = 3.2 (95% CI 0.9–5.4) CASP Tool
Randomization method: statistical software program used
Masking: no maskedAssessment
Power calculation: yes
Loss to follow-up loss: number and some reasonsreported
Patient Dropout and Treatment Adherence
Kaltenthaler et al, 200822 1 RCT/525 25.3% of participants dropped out of the iCBT program;10% of participants dropped out from the control group, who received weekly telephone calls CASP Tool
Randomization method: statistical software program used
Masking: no masked assessment
Power calculation: yes
Loss to follow-up loss: number and some reasons reported
Internet-delivered CBT compared with usual care
Symptoms and Response to Treatment
Kaltenthaler et al, 200822 1 RCT/274 iCBT vs. usual care
3 mos: −4.3 (95% CI not reported)a
5 mos: −3.9 (95% CI not reported)a
8 mos: −5.9 (95% CI not reported)a
CASP Tool
Randomization: sealed envelopes, stratified for medication and duration of current episode
Masking: no masked assessment
Power calculation: yes
Loss to follow-up: number and some reasons reported
Patient Dropout and Treatment Adherence
Kaltenthaler et al, 200822 1 RCT/274 35% dropped out during the study CASP Tool
Randomization: SPSS function
Masking: no masked assessment
Power calculation: yes
Loss to follow-up: loss and reasons reported

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; iCBT, internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy; SMD, standardized mean difference.

a

A positive improvement in symptoms in favour of iCBT. The mean differences were calculated by the authors of the health technology assessment.