Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 19;19(6):1–199.

Table 21:

Cost–Utility Analysis, Sequential Approach: Internet-Delivered CBT, In-Person CBT, and Usual Care for Major Depression, From the Societal Perspective

Strategy Mean Costs, $a,b Mean QALYs Incremental Costs, $b,c Incremental QALYsd ICER, $/QALY Gaineda
Unguided iCBT 274.53 0.777
Usual care 409.40 0.787 134.79 0.009 14,551
Guided iCBT 1,667.41 0.826 1,258.80 0.039 31,660
Group CBT 3,574.92 0.817 Dominated
Individual CBT 4,179.31 0.826 2,511.80 0.000 Dominatede

Abbreviations: CBT, cognitive behavioural therapy; iCBT, internet-delivered CBT; ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; QALY, quality-adjusted life-year.

a

Costs estimated in Table 16, additional societal costs associated with in-person CBT of $2,179.

b

All costs in 2018 Canadian dollars. No discounting was done because of the 12-month time horizon.

c

Incremental cost = average cost (strategy of guided CBT) – average cost (strategy of usual care).

d

Incremental effect = average effect (strategy of guided CBT) – average effect (strategy of usual care).

e

This is essentially dominated by guided iCBT because, after rounding, it provides a benefit equal to that of guided iCBT but is more costly; the estimated ICER for individual CBT vs. guided iCBT would be approximately $65 million if we used an actual increment in QALYs of 0.0004.

Note: Results may appear incorrect because of rounding.