Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 19;19(6):1–199.

Table A2:

Assessment of the Applicability of Studies Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of iCBT for Major Depression

Author, Year, Country Is the study population similar to the question? Are the interventions similar to the question? Is the health care system in which the study was conducted sufficiently similar to the Ontario context? Were the perspectives clearly stated? What were they? Are estimates of relative treatment effect from the best available source?
Duarte et al, 2017,37 Littlewood, et al, 2015,36 United Kingdom Yes Yes, iCBT plus usual care (drug allowed) vs usual care, low-guided No Yes, NHS Unclear
Romero-Sanchiz et al, 2017,43 Spain Yes Yes, unguided/guided vs TAU No Yes, Spain, societal Unclear
Lee et al, 2017,49 Australia Yes Partially No Yes, health care payer Unclear
Brabyn et al, 2016,38 United Kingdom Yes Partially No Yes, NHS and PPS Unclear
Dixon et al, 2016,39 United Kingdom Yes Partially No Yes, NHS and PPS Unclear
Solomon et al, 2015,48 Australia Yes Partially No No, health care payer Unclear
Titov et al, 2015,44 Australia Yes Partially No No, health care payer Unclear
Gerhards et al, 2015,45 Netherlands Yes Partially No Yes, employer and societal Unclear
Phillips et al, 2014,41 United Kingdom Partially Partially No Yes, societal Unclear
Gerhards et al, 2010,46 Netherlands Yes Partially No Yes, societal Unclear
Warmerdam et al, 2010,47 Netherlands Yes Partially No Yes, societal Unclear
Hollinghurst et al, 2010,40 United Kingdom Yes Partially No Yes, societal Unclear
Kaltenthaler et al, 2006,50 United Kingdom Yes Partially No Yes, NHS Unclear
McCrone et al, 2004,42 United Kingdom Partially Partially No Yes, NHS Unclear
Author, Year, Country Are all future costs and outcomes discounted? (If yes, at what rate?) Is the value of health effects expressed in terms of quality-adjusted life-years? Are costs and outcomes from other sectors fully and appropriately measured and valued? Overall judgement (directly applicable/partially applicable/not applicable)
Duarte et al, 2017,37 Littlewood, et al, 2015,36 United Kingdom Yes (3.5%) Yes Yes, microcosting approach accounting for cost of CBT, medications, health and social care services Partially applicable
Romero-Sanchiz et al, 2017,43 Spain No, 12 mo, NA Yes Yes, microcosting approach accounting for both direct and indirect costs Partially applicable
Lee et al, 2017,49 Australia No, 12 mo, NA Yes Yes Partially applicable
Brabyn et al, 2016,38 United Kingdom No, 12 mo, NA Yes Yes Partially applicable
Dixon et al, 2016,39 United Kingdom No, 12 mo, NA Yes Yes Partially applicable
Solomon et al, 2015,48 Australia No, 6 mo, NA Yes Partially Partially applicable
Titov et al, 2015,44 Australia No, 8 wk, NA Yes Partially Partially applicable
Gerhards et al, 2015,45 Netherlands No, 12 mo, NA Yes Partially Partially applicable
Phillips et al, 2014,41 United Kingdom No, 12 mo, NA Yes Yes Partially applicable
Gerhards et al, 2010,46 Netherlands No, 12 mo, NA Yes Yes Partially applicable
Warmerdam et al, 2010,47 Netherlands No, 12 wk, NA Yes Unclear Partially applicable
Hollinghurst et al, 2010,40 United Kingdom No, 8 mo, NA Yes Unclear Partially applicable
Kaltenthaler et al, 2006,50 United Kingdom No, 18 mo, NA Yes Yes Partially applicable
McCrone et al, 2004,42 United Kingdom No, 8 mo, NA No Yes Partially applicable

Abbreviations: CBT, cognitive-behavioural therapy; iCBT, internet-delivered CBT; NA, not applicable; NHS, National Health Service; PPS, personal social services; TAU, treatment as usual.