Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 19;19(6):1–199.

Table A8:

Efficacy Estimates Used in the Economic Model: Risk of Recurrence

Model Parameter Relative Risk (95% CI) Distribution Source
Risk of recurrence, major depression: CBT only vs no treatment 0.68 (0.53–0.76) Normal (log-odds ratio) Biesheuvel-Leliefeld et al, 201596
Risk of recurrence, major depression: CBT plus pharmacotherapy vs pharmacotherapy only 0.94a (0.72–1.21) Normal (log-odds ratio) Amick et al, 2015150
Risk of recurrence, major depression: Individual CBT vs group CBT 0.78b (0.69–0.93) Normal (log-odds ratio) Churchill et al, 200197
Risk of recurrence, major depression: Guided iCBT vs usual care 0.67 (0.54–0.83) Normal (log-odds ratio) Andrews et al, 201821
Risk of recurrence, second-generation antidepressant, sertraline 0.80 (0.69–0.93) Normal (log-odds ratio) Cipriani et al, 2009151

Abbreviations: CBT, cognitive behavioural therapy, relates to face-to-face CBT; CI, confidence interval; iCBT, internet-delivered CBT.

a

Recalculated from the reported relative risk of 1.06 (95% CI 0.82–1.38).

b

Relative risk estimated from the odds ratio after accounting for a mean baseline probability of major depressive episode in the placebo arm of 0.57.152