Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 21;64(3):823–831. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5377-9

Table 2.

Changes in manometric characteristics (acotiamide; n = 16, placebo; n = 10)

Baseline Post-treatment p value
LES pressure (median; mmHg) Acotiamide 10.7 (0.7–46.7) 16.0 (0–48.4) 0.410
Placebo 16.1 (0.6–38.2) 17.8 (3.8–27) 0.332
IRP4s (mmHg) Acotiamide 8.9 (0–27.4) 10.9 (0–29.6) 0.023
Placebo 11.5 (3.5–26.8) 12.9 (3.7–17) 0.414
Peristaltic break (cm) Acotiamide 3.1 (0–16.1) 0.8 (0–17) 0.020
Placebo 0.1 (0–4.1) 0.2 (0–14.1) 0.362
DCI (mmHg cm s) Acotiamide 1500.1 (349.1–8935.9) 3036.1 (238.2–9174.1) 0.410
Placebo 3858.1 (961.7–8158.7) 3693.5 (953.4–10,118.1) 0.759
CFV (cm/s) Acotiamide 3.2 (2.5–26.9) 4.1 (0–8.39 0.162
Placebo 3.1 (2.3–5.1) 3.5 (1.8–6.1) 0.358
% Success peristalsis Acotiamide 100 (0–100) 100 (0–100) 0.199
Placebo 100 (40–100) 100 (20–100) 0.845

Data were expressed as median (interquartile range)

LES lower esophageal sphincter, IRP integrated relaxation pressure, DCI distal contractile integral, CFV contractile front velocity