Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 12;23(1):107–117. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1834-9

Table 2.

Characteristics of included studies

Author Year of publication Design Population (primary lumbar hernia/total) Sex (M/F) Age (mean or range in years) Laparoscopic/open repair Mesh Recurrence (number of patients) Incarceration/strangulation (number of patients) Location lumbar hernia (inferior/superior/bilateral/diffuse) Follow-up (months, mean + range)
Alves 1996 Retrospective 4/4 1/3 58 (54–63) Open Marlex® mesh in one case 1 0/4/0/0 72 (24–120)
Arca 1998 Retrospective 5/7 Laparoscopic Polypropylene or PTFE 0 1–14
Blair 2015 Prospective 10/20 40% male 53 (35–70) Open Unspecified 0 24 (2–99)
Cavallaro 2007 Prospective 6/7 6/1 51–72 Open Unspecified 0 0 1/4/2§ 25 (3–36)*
Cavallaro 2009 13/13 Unspecified 4/5/0/4
Hsu 2008 Prospective 12/15 11/4 63.4 (48–81) Unspecified 1 1 3/6/3/3§ 12
Legbo 2010 Prospective 12/37 11/26 12.6 (8 months–47 years) No mesh 0 0 9 (3–54)
light 2010 20/20 2/18 15–57 Open No mesh 0 20 20/0/0/0 6
Lillie 2013 4/4 1/3 32–60 0 4/0/0/0 48
Memon 2010 5/200 150/50 43.7 (23–65) Open Unspecified 0 15 (6–24)
Moreno-Egea 2007 3/28 13/15 63 (44–80) 17 laparoscopic, 8 open Unspecified - 0 9/13/0/6§
Moreno-Egea 2013 Prospective 3/55 17/18 61.6 Laparoscopic and open Parietex™ composite/TiMesh™ lightweight 0 19/16/0/0§ 66 (38–170)*
Park 2015 Retrospective 10/13 3/10 3–83 Unspecified 1 2 10/2/0/0 (1 congenital)§ 11.3 (1–38)
Zhou 2004 Retrospective 11/11 9/3 62 (49–78) Open Unspecified 0 1 11/0/0/0 8 (2–24)

*Median follow-up (range)

No recurrences in the primary hernia group, one after laparoscopy, and three after an open repair

§The occurrence of different types in the whole population of the study is described, no specifications for the group of patients with a primary lumbar hernia in peticular