Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 6;23(1):33–41. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-01936-9

Table 6.

Mean scores, effect sizes, and significance of change (paired t test) between baseline and 6 weeks on the Vaizey and HSS for the two treatment groups for patients who reported themselves to be “cured or improved” and for patients who reported themselves to be “unchanged or worse” at 1 year

N Mean baseline (SD) Mean 6 weeks (SD) Mean difference Effect size SRM 95% CI Paired t test
Cured or improved
 HAL
  Vaizey HAL 73 5.52 (5.08) 4.71 (5.57) 0.81 (6.03) 0.16 0.13 From − 0.60 to 2.21 p > 0.05
  HSS HAL 78 5.78 (3.21) 2.46 (2.51) 3.32 (3.36) 1.03 0.99 2.56–4.08 p < 0.001
 RBL
  Vaizey RBL 55 4.85 (4.65) 3.55 (4.21) 1.31 (4.69) 0.28 0.28 0.04–2.58 p = 0.04
  HSS RBL 60 6.40 (3.22) 3.37 (3.01) 3.03 (3.01) 0.94 1.01 2.26–3.81 p < 0.001
Unchanged or worse
 HAL
  Vaizey HAL 27 5.56 (4.78) 4.19 (4.49) 1.37 (5.92) 0.29 0.23 From − 0.97 to 3.71 p > 0.05
  HSS HAL 28 7.29 (2.54) 4.43 (3.05) 2.86 (3.09) 1.13 0.93 1.66–4.05 p < 0.001
 RBL
  Vaizey RBL 27 5.85 (5.80) 4.04 (5.09) 1.82 (4.58) 0.31 0.40 0.00–3.63 p = 0.05
  HSS RBL 28 5.93 (3.25) 4.93 (3.63) 1.00 (2.84) 0.31 0.35 From − 0.10 to 2.10 p > 0.05

RBL rubber band ligation, HAL haemorrhoidal artery ligation, HSS haemorrhoid severity score