Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 6;23(1):33–41. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-01936-9

Table 7.

Mean scores, effect sizes, and significance of change (paired t test) between baseline and 1 year on the Vaizey and HSS for the two treatment groups for patients who reported themselves to be “cured or improved” and for patients who reported themselves to be “unchanged or worse” at 1 year

N Mean baseline (SD) Mean 1 year (SD) Mean difference Effect size SRM 95% CI Paired t test
Cured or improved
 HAL
  Vaizey HAL 71 5.35 (4.87) 3.82 (4.44) 1.54 (4.81) 0.32 0.32 0.40–2.67 p < 0.01
  HSS HAL 84 5.69 (3.05) 2.21 (2.12) 3.48 (3.08) 1.14 1.13 2.81–4.14 p < 0.001
 RBL
  Vaizey RBL 68 4.85 (4.36) 3.40 (4.23) 1.46 (4.76) 0.33 0.31 0.31–2.61 p < 0.01
  HSS RBL 74 6.11 (3.22) 2.57 (2.22) 3.54 (3.62) 1.01 0.98 2.70–4.38 p < 0.001
Unchanged or worse
 HAL
  Vaizey HAL 27 6.37 (4.71) 6.70 (5.02) − 0.33 (4.99) − 0.07 − 0.07 − 2.31–1.64 p > 0.05
  HSS HAL 33 7.42 (2.45) 7.24 (3.07) 0.18 (2.79) 0.07 0.06 − 0.81–1.17 p > 0.05
 RBL
  Vaizey RBL 26 4.81 (4.92) 4.12 (4.80) 0.69 (4.86) 0.14 0.14 − 1.27–2.66 p > 0.05
  HSS RBL 30 5.83 (3.16) 6.20 (4.11) − 0.37 (2.59) 0.12 − 0.14 From − 1.34 to 0.60 p > 0.05

RBL rubber band ligation, HAL haemorrhoidal artery ligation, HSS haemorrhoid severity score