Table 6.

Effect of the Community Health Development Review Meetings on CHW reporting rates

Parameter	Results
	Difference in differences (expressed in percentage points)	Area in which performance is more favorable	Presence of statistical significance
Functionality of CHWs (based on changes between baseline and post-baseline in reports submitted):
Frequency with which CHWs submit monthly reports to their peer supervisor	13.5	Intervention	P = 0.003
Frequency with which Peer Supervisors submit reports	8.5	Intervention	P = 0.498
Percentage of homes visited by CHWs (as measured from submitted reports)	14.2	Intervention	P  < 0.001
Summary	All 3 differences are more favorable for the intervention area, and 2 out of these 3 are statistically significant.

CHW – community health worker