Table 20:
Comparison | Incremental Costs (95% CrI), $ | Additional Cases Detected (95% CrI), n | Difference in Diagnostic Tests (95% CrI), n | Difference in Diagnostic-Procedure-Related Pregnancy Losses (95% CrI), n | Difference in Affected Live Births (95% CrI), n | Incremental Cost Per Case Detected, $ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Second-tier NIPT vs. traditional prenatal screening | −830,038 (−1,502,076 to –266,284) | 30 (6–56) | −2,392 (−3,275 to –1,612) | −5 (−11 to 0) | −11 (−34 to 12) | Dominant |
First-tier vs. second-tier NIPT | 34,636,006 (27,131,648– 42,272,116) | 84 (54–117) | 1,407 (1,128–1,696) | 3 (−1 to 7) | −31 (−53 to –8) | 411,274 |
Abbreviations: CrI, credible interval; NIPT, noninvasive prenatal testing.
Note: Numbers may appear inexact due to rounding.