Table A4:
Risk of Bias | Applicability Concerns | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Author, Year | Patient Selection | Index Test | Reference Standard | Flow and Timing | Patient Selection | Index Test | Reference Standard |
Bianchi et al, 201452 | Highb | Low | Low | Highc | Highd | Low | Low |
del Mar Gil et al, 201453 | Uncleare | Low | Low | Highc | Low | Low | Low |
Langlois et al, 201754 | Highb | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Nicolaides et al, 201255 | Highb | Low | Low | Highc | Low | Low | Low |
Norton et al, 201556 | Highb | Low | Low | Highc | Low | Low | Low |
Palomaki et al, 201757 | Highb | Low | Low | Highc | Low | Low | Low |
Quezada et al, 201558 | Highb | Low | Unclearf | Highc | Low | Low | Low |
Song et al, 201359 | Highb | Low | Low | Highc | Low | Low | Low |
Abbreviation: NIPT, noninvasive prenatal testing; QUADAS-2; Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.
Possible risk of bias levels: low, high, unclear.
Did not avoid inappropriate exclusions or had unclear consecutive or random enrolment of patients.
Inappropriate interval between NIPT and reference standard. Some studies missing or excluded patients in analysis.
Applicability concerns because of inappropriate patient exclusions.
Unclear patient enrolment and study exclusions.
Unclear whether reference standard was interpreted without knowledge of NIPT results.