Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 19;19(4):1–166.

Table A8:

Assessment of the Applicability of Studies on the Cost-Effectiveness of NIPT

Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of NIPT
Author, Year Is the study population similar to the question? Are the interventions similar to the question? Is the health care system in which the study was conducted sufficiently similar to the current Ontario context? Were the perspectives clearly stated and what were they? Are estimates of relative treatment effect from the best available source?
Nshimyumukiza et al, 201874 Partially Partially Yes (Quebec, Canada) Yes; public payer Yes
Huang et al, 201775 Partially Yes Yes (Ontario, Canada) Yes; public payer Yes
Maxwell et al, 201776 Partially Partially Yes (Australia) Yes; public payer Yes
Colosi et al 201777 Partially Partially Yes (Italy) Yes; health care perspective NA
Chitty et al, 201678 Partially Partially Yes (United Kingdom) Yes; United Kingdom National Screening Committee Yes
Fairbrother et al 201679 Partially Partially No (United States) No Yes
Author, Year Are all future costs and outcomes discounted? (If yes, at what rate?) Is the value of health effects expressed in terms of quality-adjusted life-years? Are costs and outcomes from other sectors fully and appropriately measured and valued? Overall judgment (directly applicable/partially applicable/not applicable)
Nshimyumukiza et al, 201874 NA No No Partially applicable
Huang et al, 201775 NA No No Partially applicable
Maxwell et al, 201776 NA No No Partially applicable
Colosi et al 201777 NA No No Partially applicable
Chitty et al, 201678 NA No No Partially applicable
Fairbrother et al 201679 Unclear No Unclear Not applicable

Note: Response options for all items were “yes,” “partially,” “no,” “unclear,” and “NA” (not applicable).