Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 22;10:230. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00230

Table 5.

Models predicting policy support and pro-environmental behavior across Studies 1 and 2.

Pro-environmental behavior
Policy choice
Study 1
Study 2
Study 1
Study 2
Variable β SE β SE β SE β SE
Gender (M) -0.05 0.12 -0.26 0.12 0.19 0.11 0.11 0.14
Age 0.02∗∗ 0.00 0.01∗∗ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Politics -0.06 0.05 -0.04 0.04 -0.02 0.04 -0.06 0.05
Income 0.01 0.03 -0.04 0.03 -0.04 0.03 0.02 0.03
Belief -0.17 0.18 -0.19 0.16 0.26 0.17 0.16 0.18
Skepticism -0.17 0.11 -0.14 0.09 -0.41∗∗∗ 0.11 -0.29∗∗ 0.10
Behavioral control -0.05 0.06 0.10 0.07 0.14 0.05 0.10 0.08
PD1 -0.19 0.09 -0.09 0.06 0.02 0.08 -0.02 0.07
BIF-E 0.22∗∗ 0.08 0.05 0.09
BIF-G 0.03 0.06 -0.04 0.07 0.03 0.05 -0.03 0.08
RCW-E 0.06 0.06 -0.06 0.07 0.14 0.06 0.06 0.08
RCW-G 0.01 0.06 0.02 0.07 -0.03 0.06 -0.10 0.08
Time perspective 0.37∗∗ 0.08 0.25∗∗ 0.07 0.22∗∗ 0.07 0.02 0.08
Place attachment -0.01 0.06 0.10 0.06 0.18∗∗ 0.06 -0.02 0.07
Constant -0.37 0.34 0.41 0.30 -0.27 0.31 -0.09 0.34

Observations 217 213 217 213
R2 0.44 0.41 0.51 0.22
Adjusted R2 0.40 0.36 0.48 0.17
Residual SE 0.77 (df = 203) 0.80 (df = 198) 0.72 (df = 203) 0.92 (df = 198)

p < 0.1; p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001; mediated by skepticism; mediated by PD1.