Table 5.
Models predicting policy support and pro-environmental behavior across Studies 1 and 2.
Pro-environmental behavior |
Policy choice |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study 1 |
Study 2 |
Study 1 |
Study 2 |
|||||
Variable | β | SE | β | SE | β | SE | β | SE |
Gender (M) | -0.05 | 0.12 | -0.26∗ | 0.12 | 0.19 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.14 |
Age | 0.02∗∗ | 0.00 | 0.01∗∗ | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Politics | -0.06 | 0.05 | -0.04 | 0.04 | -0.02 | 0.04 | -0.06 | 0.05 |
Income | 0.01 | 0.03 | -0.04 | 0.03 | -0.04 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
Belief | -0.17 | 0.18 | -0.19 | 0.16 | 0.26 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.18 |
Skepticism | -0.17‡ | 0.11 | -0.14 | 0.09 | -0.41∗∗∗ | 0.11 | -0.29∗∗ | 0.10 |
Behavioral control | -0.05 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.14∗ | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.08 |
PD1 | -0.19∗ | 0.09 | -0.09 | 0.06 | 0.02† | 0.08 | -0.02† | 0.07 |
BIF-E | – | – | 0.22∗∗ | 0.08 | – | – | 0.05 | 0.09 |
BIF-G | 0.03 | 0.06 | -0.04 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.05 | -0.03 | 0.08 |
RCW-E | 0.06 | 0.06 | -0.06 | 0.07 | 0.14∗ | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.08 |
RCW-G | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.07 | -0.03 | 0.06 | -0.10 | 0.08 |
Time perspective | 0.37∗∗ | 0.08 | 0.25∗∗ | 0.07 | 0.22∗∗ | 0.07 | 0.02 | 0.08 |
Place attachment | -0.01 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.18∗∗ | 0.06 | -0.02 | 0.07 |
Constant | -0.37 | 0.34 | 0.41 | 0.30 | -0.27 | 0.31 | -0.09 | 0.34 |
Observations | 217 | 213 | 217 | 213 | ||||
R2 | 0.44 | 0.41 | 0.51 | 0.22 | ||||
Adjusted R2 | 0.40 | 0.36 | 0.48 | 0.17 | ||||
Residual SE | 0.77 | (df = 203) | 0.80 | (df = 198) | 0.72 | (df = 203) | 0.92 | (df = 198) |
p < 0.1; ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001; †mediated by skepticism; ‡mediated by PD1.