Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Child Dev. 2018 Aug 31;91(1):145–162. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13140

Table 2.

Interscale Correlations for Social Information Processing Variables

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1. Hostile Attributions - .56** .51** .50** .38** .33* .26* .27* .28* .23* .27* .19
2. Rejection Attributions - .91** .82** .61** .39** .33** .30* .31** .30* .29** .25*
3. Disrespect Attributions - .84** .61** .41** .34** .31** .33** .18 .29** .18
4. Anger - .67** .46** .43** .39** .40** .35** .34** .28*
5. Revenge Goals - .62** .65** .64** .65** .40** .50** .43**
6. Dominance Goals - .60** .70** .54** .25* .32** .18
7. Overt Aggressive Responses - .84** .89** .37** .35** .35**
8. Dominance Responses - .84** .36** .43** .31**
9. Relationally Aggressive Responses - .38** .38** .37**
10. Aggressive Outcome Expectancies - .63** .67**
11. Self-Efficacy for Aggression - .44**
12. Moral Acceptability of Aggression -
*

Note. p < .05,

**

p < .01