Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 28;9:3046. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39377-x

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The MN-MS model performs slightly worse than the Poisson regression models in identifying the true non-zero slopes (left panel) but performs substantially better in identifying the true zero slopes (right panel). Results for the Poisson model without model selection (Poisson no MS; purple), with AIC model selection (Poisson AIC MS; red), and the MN model with model selection (MN-MS; blue) are displayed. A 1:1 line was added for reference (dashed diagonal line), where results closer to this line indicate better performance. Circles represent the median, thick lines represent the 20–80% range, while thin lines represent the full range (minimum to maximum) based on 10 datasets. Left panel: The x-axis displays the true number of non-zero slopes used to generate the data while the y-axis reveals how many of these slopes were correctly identified to be non-zero and were estimated with the correct sign. Right panel: The x-axis displays the true number of zero slopes used to generate the data while the y-axis reveals how many of these slopes were correctly identified to be zero.