Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb;19(1):e116–e126. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2018.10.008

Table 3.

Uptake of Tamoxifen According to Participant Characteristics and Univariable and Multivariable Logistic Regression Model (n = 258)

Uptake, n (%) Univariable
Multivariable
OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
Age
 ≤35 Yearsa 1 (3.8)a
 36-49 Years 29 (17.3) 1.46 (0.63-3.39) .378 1.19 (0.44-3.18) .731
 ≥50 Years 8 (12.5) Ref Ref
Children
 Yes 36 (17.6) 5.43 (1.26-23.34) .023 3.66 (0.76-17.64) .106
 No 2 (3.8) Ref Ref
Ethnic Groupa
 White 37 (15)
 Other 1 (11.1)
Education Level
 Degree or above 20 (17.2) 1.41 (0.71-2.82) .327 1.50 (0.66-3.42) .335
 Below degree level 18 (12.9) Ref Ref
Health Status
 Poora 0
 Fair 5 (10.6) 0.68 (0.20-2.32) .538 0.53 (0.13-2.13) .372
 Good 25 (16.6) 1.13 (0.46-2.82) .787 0.97 (0.37-2.60) .958
 Excellent 7 (14.9) Ref Ref
Risk Level
 Moderate 24 (15.1) 1.05 (0.52-2.15) .885 0.84 (0.38-1.82) .651
 High 14 (14.4) Ref Ref
 Uncleara 0
SES
 Low (most deprived) 7 (11.9) 0.78 (0.30-2.03) .613 1.23 (0.44-3.39) .695
 Middle 14 (16.3) 1.13 (0.52-2.47) .759 1.38(0.57-3.33) .479
 High (least deprived) 16 (14.7) Ref Ref
Employment
 Full-time 32 (14.5) Ref Ref
 All other employment 6 (16.2) 1.14 (0.44-2.96) .783 1.82 (0.63-5.22) .269
Marital Status
 Married or cohabiting 33 (16.7) 2.16 (0.80-5.81) .127 1.47 (0.44-4.93) .534
 Unmarried 5 (8.5) Ref Ref
Medication Belief Group
 Group 1 (low need, lower concerns) 33 (18.3) 3.28 (1.23-8.75) .018 3.37 (1.08-10.51) .036
 Group 2 (low need, higher concerns) 5 (6.4) Ref Ref

Bold P values indicate statistical significance P < .05.

Abbreviations: OR = odds ratio; Ref = reference; SES = socioeconomic status.

a

Category not included in univariable and multivariable analyses because of insufficient cases; the multivariable model included 213 respondents.