Table III.
Comparison | Class | Order | Family | Genus | Species |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CO vs. SG0 | Clostridia↓ | Clostridiales↓ | Ruminococcaceae↓ | Fusobacterium_mortiferum↓ | |
Peptostreptococcaceae↓ | |||||
CO vs. RYGB0 | Unidentified_Actinobacteria↓ | Bifidobacteriales↓ | Bifidobacteriaceae↓ | Bifidobacterium↓ | |
Peptostreptococcaceae↓ | Megasphaera↓ | ||||
SG0 vs. SG3 | Bacilli↑ | Lactobacillales↑ | Streptococcaceae↑ | Alistipes↑ | Streptococcus_salivarius_subsp_thermophilus↑ |
Rikenellaceae↑ | Streptococcus↑ | ||||
Porphyromonadaceae↑ | Alitipes_finegoldii↑ | ||||
RYGB0 vs. RYGB3 | Bacilli↑ | Lactobacillales↑ | Streptococcaceae↑ | Streptococcus↑ | Streptococcus_salivarius_subsp_thermophilus↑ |
Negativicutes↓ | Selenomonadales↓ | Ruminococcaceae_ | |||
NK4A214_group↑ | |||||
Faecalibacterium↓ |
The LEfSe with default parameters was used to identify species with significant differences between groups. The detailed statistical method used in LEfSe software (version 1.0) was the Kruskal-Wallis test. Increased items are indicated by ↑ and decreased items by ↓. All of the trends indicated in the table had statistical significance (LDA score >4). CO, control group; SG, sleeve gastrectomy; RYGB, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; SG0/3, group prior to/3 months after SG; LDA, linear discriminant analysis.