Bach 2002.
Methods | Parallel RCT Ethics committee: approved by the ethics committee Informed consents: written informed consents obtained Site: University of Saarland, Homburg/Saarland, Germany Setting: university hospital Dates of data collection: unspecified Funding: supported in part by the industry Registration: unspecified |
|
Participants | 40 participants: mean age 63.0 years; sex distribution: 12 females and 28 males Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions |
Intervention
Comparator
Premedication: 1 mg of flunitrazepam orally on the day of surgery Induction: fentanyl 10 mcg/kg, midazolam 40 mcg/kg, etomidate 0.15 mg/kg, and pancuronium 0.1 mg/kg Maintenance: fentanyl/midazolam infusion (10/75 mcg/kg/h) and pancuronium Surgery: CABG with CPB |
|
Outcomes |
Relevant to this review
Others
|
|
Notes | Correspondence: email sent 16 March 2018; no reply Conflict of interest: supported in part by the industry DOI: n/a |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "drawing lots" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Assigned the day before surgery; "randomizing box’ contained 20 lots of each group" |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | One participant died at 8 hours after surgery, as included in the review |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All results reported |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Control group consisted of 27 participants; 13 of them received a dopexamine infusion Supported in part by the industry |