Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 1;2019(3):CD006715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006715.pub3

Barrington 2005.

Methods Parallel randomized controlled trial
Ethics committee: approved by the ethics committee
Informed consents: written informed consents obtained
Site: St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
Setting: university hospital
Dates of data collection: from December 1999 to March 2002
Funding: grants from the Australian Society of Anaesthetists and the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists
Registration: unspecified
Participants 120 participants scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting surgery; mean age 62.5 years; sex distribution: 16 females and 104 males
Inclusion criteria
  1. Patients scheduled for elective CABG surgery (using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)) were eligible


Exclusion criteria
  1. Emergency or repeat CABG surgery

  2. Combined valve and CABG surgery

  3. Aspirin ingestion within 6 days of surgery

  4. Platelet count 150 × 10⁹/L

  5. International normalized ratio 1.1

  6. Active neurological disease

  7. Cutaneous disorders at the epidural insertion site

Interventions Intervention
  1. Epidural analgesia (N = 60)


Comparator
  1. Systemic analgesia (N = 60)


Premedication: temazepam, ranitidine, and morphine
Induction: midazolam, fentanyl, propofol, and rocuronium
Maintenance: propofol
Surgery: CABG with CPB using a membrane oxygenator
Outcomes Relevant to this review
  1. Risk of mortality

  2. Risk of myocardial infarction

  3. Risk of pulmonary complications

  4. Risk of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter

  5. Risk of neurological complications (cerebrovascular accident)

  6. Tracheal extubation

  7. Pain scores

  8. Haemodynamic variables


Others
  1. Arterial blood PaO₂ and PaCO₂

Notes Correspondence: email sent 16 March 2018; no reply
Conflict of interest: none reported
DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000146437.88485.47
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Patients were randomized the day before surgery to 2 groups. The random allocation sequence was computer‐generated in permuted blocks of 4 and was enclosed in sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Opaque sealed envelopes
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Twelve‐lead ECGs were recorded before surgery and on postoperative days 1 and 5 and were assessed by 2 observers blinded to group allocation and postoperative clinical course. No mention of blinding for any other outcome
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No loss to follow‐up. Two participants with failed epidural were kept in the analysis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All prespecified outcomes were reported
Other bias Unclear risk All participants were included in the intention‐to‐treat analysis. Prevalence of cerebrovascular and peripheral vascular disease was more frequent in the epidural group