Dohle 2001.
Methods | Parallel RCT Ethics committee: approved Informed consents: obtained Site: New Delhi, India Setting: university hospital Dates of data collection: not reported Funding: unspecified Registration: unspecified |
|
Participants | 41 participants, for participants included in the analysis: mean age: 56 years; sex distribution: 7 females and 33 males Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions |
Intervention
Comparator
Premedication: lorazepam and morphine Induction and maintenance: midazolam, fentanyl (total dose 5 mcg/kg), nitrous oxide, isoflurane, and vecuronium Surgery: off‐pump CABG |
|
Outcomes |
Relevant to this review
Others
|
|
Notes | Correspondence: email sent 16 March 2018; no reply Conflict of interest: not reported DOI: 10.1053/jcan.2001.23271 |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "randomized study"; no details provided |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "an independent observer who was blinded to the analgesia technique recorded" |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | One failed epidural |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All results reported |
Other bias | Low risk | Not in intention‐to‐treat Groups had similar demographic data |