Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 1;2019(3):CD006715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006715.pub3

Kirno 1994.

Methods Parallel RCT
Ethics committee: approved
Informed consents: obtained
Site: Goteberg, Sweden
Setting: university hospitals
Dates of data collection: unspecified
Funding: this work was supported by grants from the Swedish Medical Research Council (No. 08682,09047, and 09720), the Medical Faculty at the University of Goteborg, the Medical Society of Goteborg, and the Swedish Heart‐Lung Foundation
Registration: unspecified
Participants 20 participants: mean age: not reported; sex distribution: not reported
Inclusion criteria
  1. Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

  2. All patients had a history of stable ischaemic heart disease with 2‐ or 3‐vessel coronary artery disease

  3. Ejection fraction > 50%


Exclusion criteria
  1. Patients with coexisting valvular anomaly, arrhythmias, or diabetes mellitus

Interventions Intervention
  1. Epidural analgesia (N = 10)


Comparator
  1. Systemic analgesia (N = 10)


Induction: thiopental, pancuronium, and fentanyl
Maintenace: nitrous oxide in oxygen and fentanyl
Surgery: CABG with CPB
Outcomes Relevant to this review
  1. Risk of mortality

  2. Haemodynamic variables


Others
  1. Regional myocardial oxygen consumption

  2. Myocardial ischaemia

  3. Noradrenaline spillover (sympathetic nervous system activation)

Notes Correspondence: letter sent 16 March 2018; no reply
Conflict of interest: none reported
DOI: n/a
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Participants were randomized to 2 groups; no details provided
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No loss to follow‐up
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All prespecified outcomes reported
Other bias Unclear risk No failed epidural reported
No details on preoperative groups' demographic data