Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 1;2019(3):CD006715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006715.pub3

Lenkutis 2009.

Methods Parallel RCT
Ethics committee: approved by the local Ethics Committee of Kaunas Medical University
Informed consents: obtained the day before surgery
Site: Clinic of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Kaunas University Hospital, Kaunas, Lithuania
Setting: university hospital
Dates of data collection: unspecified
Funding: unspecified
Registration: unspecified
Participants 60 participants; mean age: 65.4 years; sex distribution: 27 females and 33 males
Inclusion criteria
  1. New York Heart Association class II to III and ASA class III participants,

  2. Presenting with double‐ or triple‐vessel disease

  3. LVEF > 50%

  4. Undergoing CABG surgery with CPB.


Exclusion criteria
  1. Pulmonary or neuromuscular disease

  2. Abnormal preoperative chest radiograph or preoperative respiratory status

Interventions Intervention
  1. Epidural analgesia (N = 30)


Comparator
  1. Systemic analgesia (N = 30)


Premedication: midazolam and morphine
Induction: fentanyl, midazolam, etomidate, and rocuronium
Maintenance: sevoflurane, midazolam, and fentanyl for the systemic analgesia group
Surgery: CABG with CPB using a hollow‐fibre membranous oxygenator
Outcomes Relevant to this review
  1. Tracheal extubation


Others
  1. Global end‐diastolic volume index

  2. Intrathoracic blood volume index

  3. Extravascular lung water index

Notes Correspondence: email sent 16 March 2018; no reply
Conflict of interest: not reported
DOI: 10.1177/0267659109348724
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomized; no details provided
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No loss to follow‐up
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All results reported
Other bias Low risk No failed epidural reported
Groups well balanced