Lundstrom 2005.
Methods | Parallel RCT Ethics committee: approved by the local ethics committee Informed consents: written informed consents obtained Site: Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark Setting: university hospital Dates of data collection: from 3 January 2000 to 12 December 2000 Funding: this research was supported by The Danish Heart Foundation, Copenhagen, Denmark, by research grants No. 99‐2‐3‐79‐22764 and 99‐1‐5‐92‐22709 Registration: unspecified |
|
Participants | 50 participants; mean age: 64.6 years; sex distribution: not reported Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions |
Intervention
Comparator
Induction: midazolam, fentanyl, and pancuronium Maintenance: midazolam, pancuronium, and fentanyl or epidural analgesia Surgery: CABG with CPB |
|
Outcomes |
Relevant to this review
Other
|
|
Notes | Correspondence: email sent 16 March 2018; no reply Conflict of interest: not reported DOI: n/a |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | The randomization list was generated from a table of random numbers |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Quote: "the data analyses were blinded in relation to any clinical information" |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No loss to follow‐up |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All prespecified outcomes reported |
Other bias | Low risk | No failed epidural reported No statistically significant differences between demographic data for the 2 groups |