Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 1;2019(3):CD006715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006715.pub3

Lundstrom 2005.

Methods Parallel RCT
Ethics committee: approved by the local ethics committee
Informed consents: written informed consents obtained
Site: Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
Setting: university hospital
Dates of data collection: from 3 January 2000 to 12 December 2000
Funding: this research was supported by The Danish Heart Foundation, Copenhagen, Denmark, by research grants No. 99‐2‐3‐79‐22764 and 99‐1‐5‐92‐22709
Registration: unspecified
Participants 50 participants; mean age: 64.6 years; sex distribution: not reported
Inclusion criteria
  1. Undergoing elective CABG

  2. Age greater than 18 years

  3. Sinus rhythm on preoperative ECG

  4. Written and oral informed consent


Exclusion criteria
  1. Oral anticoagulation and coagulopathy

Interventions Intervention
  1. Epidural analgesia (N = 26)


Comparator
  1. Systemic analgesia (N = 24)


Induction: midazolam, fentanyl, and pancuronium
Maintenance: midazolam, pancuronium, and fentanyl or epidural analgesia
Surgery: CABG with CPB
Outcomes Relevant to this review
  1. Risk of mortality

  2. Risk of in‐hospital pulmonary complications (respiratory depression)


Other
  1. Episodic hypoxaemia

Notes Correspondence: email sent 16 March 2018; no reply
Conflict of interest: not reported
DOI: n/a
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk The randomization list was generated from a table of random numbers
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "the data analyses were blinded in relation to any clinical information"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No loss to follow‐up
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All prespecified outcomes reported
Other bias Low risk No failed epidural reported
No statistically significant differences between demographic data for the 2 groups