Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 1;2019(3):CD006715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006715.pub3

Onan 2011.

Methods Parallel RCT
Ethics committee: approved
Informed consents: obtained
Site: Kocaeli, Turkey
Setting: university hospital
Dates of data collection: not reported
Funding: unspecified
Registration: unspecified
Participants 30 participants; mean age: 59.0 years; sex distribution: 3 females and 27 males
Inclusion criteria
  1. Patients with documented 3‐vessel coronary artery disease who were scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery


Exclusion criteria
  1. Decreased ventricular function (ejection fraction 40%)

  2. Emergency operation

  3. Previous cardiothoracic operation

  4. Unstable angina

  5. Resting bradycardia (< 60 beats/min)

  6. Critical left main coronary artery disease (50% stenosis)

  7. Contraindications to the epidural technique including pre‐existing coagulopathy

  8. Preoperative anticoagulation (full therapeutic doses of standard or low–molecular‐weight heparin, warfarin, thrombolytic drugs, or potent antiplatelet drugs)

  9. Systemic or local infection

  10. Previous cervical or upper thoracic operation

  11. Vertebral deformity

  12. Drug hypersensitivity

Interventions Intervention
  1. Epidural analgesia (N = 15)


Comparator
  1. Systemic analgesia (N = 15)


Premedication: midazolam
Induction: midazolam, fentanyl, and rocuronium
Maintenance: nitrous oxide, propofol, fentanyl, and rocuronium
Surgery: CABG with CPB
Outcomes Relevant to this review
  1. Risk of mortality

  2. Risk of myocardial infarction


Others
  1. Immunoreactivity

  2. Graft blood flow

Notes Correspondence: email sent 16 March 2018; no reply
Conflict of interest: not reported
DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.06.004
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomization was performed immediately before surgery using sealed envelopes
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Randomization was performed immediately before surgery using sealed envelopes
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No loss to follow‐up
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All results reported
Other bias Low risk No failed epidural reported
Groups had similar demographic data