Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 1;2019(3):CD006715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006715.pub3

Rein 1989.

Methods Parallel RCT
Ethics committee: approved by the ethical committee of the hospital
Informed consents: obtained from all participants
Site: Trondheim, Norway
Setting: university hospital
Dates of data collection: unspecified
Funding: this study was supported by a grant from the Norwegian Council for Cardiovascular Diseases
Registration: unspecified
Participants 16 participants: age: 60.3 years; sex distribution: 16 males
Inclusion criteria
  1. Male patients

  2. Requiring CABG with extracorporeal circulation


Exclusion criteria
  1. Not reported

Interventions Intervention
  1. Epidural analgesia (N = 8)


Comparator
  1. Systemic analgesia (N = 8)


Premedication: morphine and scopolamine
Induction: thiopentone and pancuronium
Maintenance: nitrous oxide, diazepam, and fentanyl or epidural analgesia
Surgery: CABG with CPB using a bubble oxygenator
Outcomes Relevant to this review
  1. Risk of mortality

  2. Haemodynamic variables


Others
  1. Postoperative haemodynamics

Notes Correspondence: letter sent 16 March 2018; no reply
Conflict of interest: none reported
DOI: n/a
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "16 male patients were allocated at random to two groups"; no details provided
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk One participant died 9 hours postoperatively and was excluded from final analyses
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All results reported
Other bias Unclear risk Not in intention‐to‐treat
Groups had similar demographic data