Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 1;2019(3):CD006715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006715.pub3

Stenseth 1994.

Methods Parallel RCT
Ethics committee: approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Trondheim
Informed consents: obtained
Site: Trondheim, Norway
Setting: university hospital
Dates of data collection: unspecified
Funding: departmental/institutional
Registration: unspecified
Participants 28 participants: mean age: 54.9 years; sex distribution: 28 males
Inclusion criteria
  1. Male

  2. ASA III patients

  3. < 65 years

  4. LVEF > 50%

  5. Undergoing CABG for double‐vessel or triple‐vessel disease


Exclusion criteria
  1. Not reported

Interventions Intevention
  1. Epidural analgesia and high‐ (N = 10) or low‐dose fentanyl (N = 8)


Comparator
  1. Systemic analgesia (N = 10)


Premedication: morphine and scopolamine
Induction: thiopentone and pancuronium
Maintenance: fentanyl, diazepam, and nitrous oxide
Surgery: CABG with CPB
Outcomes Relevant to this review
  1. Risk of mortality

  2. Risk of myocardial infarction

  3. Haemodynamic variables


Others
  1. Use of vasoactive drugs

Notes Correspondence: data no longer available
Conflict of interest: none reported
DOI: n/a
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "randomized"; no details
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Two participants were excluded from the final analysis due to surgical problems
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All results reported
Other bias Unclear risk Not in intention‐to‐treat
Groups had similar demographic data