Stenseth 1996.
Methods | Parallel RCT Ethics committee: approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Trondheim Informed consents: obtained Site: Trondheim, Norway Setting: university hospital Dates of data collection: unspecified Funding: unspecified Registration: unspecified |
|
Participants | 52 participants: mean age: 55.2 years; sex distribution: 52 males Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions |
Intervention
Comparator
Premedication: morphine and scopolamine Induction and maintenance: diazepam, thiopentone, nitrous oxide, and pancuronium Surgery: CABG with CPB using a bubble oxygenator |
|
Outcomes |
Relevant to this review
Others
|
|
Notes | Correspondence: data are no longer available Conflict of interest: not reported DOI: n/a |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "randomized into two groups"; no details provided |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Two participants were excluded from the analysis because of complications experienced |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All results reported |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Not in intention‐to‐treat Groups had similar demographic data |