Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 1;2019(3):CD006715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006715.pub3

Yilmaz 2007.

Methods Parallel RCT
Ethics committee: approved by the ethics committee
Informed consents: not reported
Site: Yeditepe University Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation Anabilim; Psychiatry Ersek Chest Cardiovascular Center; Anesthesia Clinic and Special Swiss Hospital Breast Cardiovascular Anesthesiology, Turkey
Setting: university hospital
Dates of data collection: not reported
Funding: unspecified
Registration: unspecified
Participants 34 participants; mean age: 55.7 years; sex distribution: 7 females and 27 males
Inclusion criteria
  1. ASA II to III

  2. Aged < 70 years

  3. LVEF > 40%

  4. Undergoing elective CABG


Exclusion criteria
  1. Not reported

Interventions Intervention
  1. Epidural analgesia (N = 17)


Comparator
  1. Systemic analgesia (N = 17)


Premedication: atropine and midazolam
Induction: fentanyl, midazolam, and pancuronium
Maintenance: fentanyl, midazolam, and isoflurane
Surgery: CABG with CPB
Outcomes Relevant to this review
  1. Risk of pulmonary complications (pneumonia)

  2. Time to tracheal extubation

  3. Risk of neurological complications (serious neurological complications from epidural analgesia)

  4. Pain scores

  5. Haemodynamic variables


Others
  1. Rescue analgesia

  2. Lung function tests

Notes Correspondence: letter sent 16 March 2018; no reply
Conflict of interest: not reported
DOI: n/a
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "randomized"; no details provided
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "randomized"; no details provided
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No loss to follow‐up
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All results reported
Other bias Low risk No failed epidural mentioned
Groups well balanced