Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 7;44(2):102–110. doi: 10.1503/jpn.170150

Table 1.

Demographic, psychopathological and clinical characteristics of study participants

Characteristic Patients, mean ± SD*
n = 29
Healthy controls, mean ± SD*
n = 20
Statistical test p value
Age, yr 27.7 ± 7.2 30.6 ± 6.6 t47 = 1.45 0.15
Sex, female:male 7:22 6:14 χ21 = 0.21 0.65
Education, yr 11.4 ± 2.8 14.2 ± 2.5 U = 101.5 ≤ 0.001
Smoking, pack-years 5.7 ± 13.7 2.4 ± 4.8 U = 239.5 0.25
Duration of illness, yr 7.2 ± 7.1
Age of onset, yr 21.0 ± 4.8
Chlorpromazine equivalents, mg/d 497.7 ± 407.4
BNSS score
 Apathy (motivation and pleasure) 15.5 ± 6.9
 Diminished expression 8.6 ± 7.0
SANS score§
 Apathy 11.9 ± 5.6
 Diminished expression 10.4 ± 9.6
PANSS score
 Positive 6.4 ± 2.5
 Negative 12.0 ± 5.2
 Disorganized 4.7 ± 2.0
 Excited 4.5 ± 0.7
 Depressed 5.4 ± 2.4
 Total 47.7 ± 10.2
CDSS total score 2.1 ± 2.5
GAF score 58.1 ± 9.6
PSP total score 58.2 ± 9.1
Cognition (composite cognitive ability)** −0.85 ± 0.80 0 ± 0.58 t47 = 4.07 ≤ 0.001
MWT IQ 24.5 ± 6.0 28.7 ± 2.8 t47 = 2.89 0.006

BNSS = Brief Negative Symptom Scale; CDSS = Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia; GAF = Global Assessment of Functioning; MWT IQ = Multiple Word Test Intelligence Quotient; PANSS = Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale; PSP = Personal and Social Performance scale; SANS = Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms; SD = standard deviation.

*

Unless otherwise indicated.

All patients were receiving atypical antipsychotics at the time of testing.

We investigated potential group differences using 2-sample t tests for continuous data and χ2 tests for categorical data. For data with non-normal distribution, we applied Mann–Whitney U tests.

§

Apathy includes avolition/apathy and anhedonia/asociality; diminished expression includes affective flattening or blunting and alogia.

Positive factor = P1, P3, P5, P9; negative factor = N1, N2, N3, N4, N6, G7; disorganized factor = P2, G5, N11; excited factor = P4, P7, G8, G14; depressed factor = G2, G3, G6.

**

Cognition data have been z-transformed based on the data of the control group for each test separately. The composite cognitive ability score was computed as the mean of the z-transformed test scores at the participant level.