Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 1;9:3292. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38619-2

Table 1.

Reaction times for each subject and each condition.

Subject Experimental condition Minimum (ms) 25% lower quartile (ms) Median (ms) 75% upper quartile (ms) Maximum (ms) Number of trials responded to and within response time bounds
1 200 ms 348 422 459 495 821 81/86
digital touch probe 169 254 313 374 719 73/103
null simulation N/A N/A 724 N/A N/A 1/40
off-target stimulation 0/20
2 100 ms 182 232 277 314 551 36/40
200 ms 188 235 254 276 372 40/40
400 ms 169 244 261 288 380 40/40
800 ms 180 234 265 291 488 40/40
digital touch probe 151 189 198 228 726 38/40
null simulation N/A N/A 449 N/A N/A 1/40
off-target stimulation 0/40
3 100 ms N/A N/A 514 N/A N/A 1/40
200 ms 403 409 442 494 553 9/40
400 ms 383 455 515 603 747 26/40
800 ms 348 466 528 806 994 31/40
digital touch probe 151 169 222 318 507 30/40
null simulation 0/40
off-target stimulation N/A N/A 484 N/A N/A 1/40
4 100 ms 218 219 220 503 786 3/40
200 ms 213 347 408 595 754 13/40
400 ms 305 371 423 588 857 17/40
800 ms 240 334 400 624 882 22/40
digital touch probe 153 178 201 234 556 19/40
null simulation 0/40
off-target stimulation 0/40

In all subjects, cortical stimulation resulted in significantly different reactions times than haptic stimulation (assessed through non-parametric Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Kruskal-Wallis tests). Final column reports the number of trials responded to by each subject across both blocks for each of the trial types given our response time limits of 150–1000 ms, and appropriate signal detection. Response times outside of this range were considered outliers based on expected human performance (see Methods, Data Analysis for details). Blank boxes indicate trial types with no responses.