Table 3.
Summary of the best fitting migration models (based on Bayes factor, see Supplementary Table S4) for foothill and subalpine populations of P. elatior, their differentiation, and numbers of immigrants per generation (Nm) between populations estimated by migrate-n.
| Range | Model | Nm | Pairwise FST |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeseníky | F1 → F2 | 206 | 0.06 |
| Krkonoše | F3 → F4 | 551 | 0.05 |
| Jeseníky | S1 → F1 | 261 | 0.08 |
| Jeseníky | S2 → F1 | 21 | 0.09 |
| Jeseníky | S1 → F2 | 161 | 0.07 |
| Jeseníky | S2 → F2 | 173 | 0.07 |
| Krkonoše | S3 → F3 | 68 | 0.07 |
| Krkonoše | S4 → F3 | 17 | 0.11 |
| Krkonoše | S3 → F4 | 257 | 0.09 |
| Krkonoše | S4 → F4 | 73 | 0.13 |
| Nízké Tatry | S5 → F5 | 14 | 0.13 |
| Jeseníky | S1 → S2 | 266 | 0.04 |
| Krkonoše | S4 → S3 | 5 | 0.13 |
F = foothill populations, S = subalpine populations.