Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 18;5(1):e000798. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000798

Table 3.

Summary results for sarilumab 200 mg q2w combination vs other DMARD combinations in the csDMARD-IR population: median estimates of relative treatment effects (95% credible intervals) (base case) for week 24 efficacy and week 52 mTSS and safety (SI, SAE)

Sarilumab 200 mg+csDMARD combination vs ACR20 OR rREM
(DIC=671.68)
ACR50 OR rREM
(DIC=632.99)
ACR70 OR rREM
(DIC=560.94)
DAS28<2.6 OR rREM (DIC=427.34) HAQ CFB diff REM
(DIC=–133.71)
mTSS 24 week CFB diff FEM (DIC=49.51) mTSS 52 week CFB diff FEM (DIC=17.72) SI 52 week RD REM
(DIC=–44.23)
SAE 52 week OR REM
(DIC=140.50)
csDMARDs+placebo 4.45
(2.43 to 8.25)
5.14
(2.82 to 9.7)
7.32
(3.03 to 20.69)
7.88
(4.35 to 15.81)
–0.25
(–0.36 to –0.141)
–1.091
(–1.601 to –0.575)
–2.53
(–3.42 to –1.65)
0.012
(–0.151 to 0.178)
2.31
(0.57 to 9.46)
csDMARDs+:
Abatacept 1.04
(0.52 to 2.03)
1.14
(0.58 to 2.25)
1.15
(0.43 to 3.29)
1.37
(0.67 to 2.94)
0.01
(–0.156 to 0.177)
–0.13
(–1.73 to 1.44)
0.004
(–0.178 to 0.202)
2.61
(0.56 to 13.63)
Baricitinib 2 mg 1.38
(0.61 to 3.15)
1.56
(0.7 to 3.6)
1.21
(0.39 to 4.19)
1.33
(0.63 to 3.15)
–0.003
(–0.181 to 0.175)
–0.721
(–1.353 to –0.087)
Baricitinib 4 mg 0.9
(0.43 to 1.87)
0.97
(0.46 to 1.95)
0.83
(0.28 to 2.4)
0.97
(0.48 to 2.04)
0.053
(–0.11 to 0.219)
–0.541
(–1.236 to 0.155)
Tofacitinib 1.69
(0.85 to 3.36)
1.3
(0.66 to 2.66)
1.07
(0.38 to 3.42)
2
(0.94 to 4.71)
0.037
(–0.102 to 0.177)
–0.739
(–1.357 to –0.122)
Adalimumab 1.26
(0.66 to 2.42)
1.17
(0.61 to 2.24)
1.28
(0.5 to 3.55)
1.27
(0.66 to 2.94)
0.016
(–0.12 to 0.144)
–0.082
(–0.848 to 0.684)
0.07
(–1.39 to 1.49)
–0.017
(–0.221 to 0.192)
2.91
(0.37 to 26.5)
Certolizumab 1.23
(0.58 to 2.68)
1.18
(0.57 to 2.66)
1.28
(0.44 to 4.75)
1.24
(0.49 to 3.22)
0.066
(–0.073 to 0.198)
–0.906
(–1.637 to –0.178)
–0.14
(–1.54 to 1.26)
–0.018
(–0.250 to 0.212)
1.02
(0.13 to 7.78)
Etanercept 0.64
(0.24 to 1.67)
0.7
(0.26 to 1.83)
0.61
(0.09 to 2.99)
0.4
(0.15 to 1.03)
0.204
(–0.181 to 0.604)
–1.24
(–3.09 to 0.63)
Golimumab 1.19
(0.59 to 2.37)
1.39
(0.7 to 2.84)
1.29
(0.48 to 4.03)
1.43
(0.72 to 2.94)
0.088
(–0.045 to 0.22)
0.011
(–0.676 to 0.706)
Infliximab 1.41
(0.7 to 2.88)
1.4
(0.67 to 3.01)
1.3
(0.44 to 3.93)
1.39
(0.67 to 3)
0.165
(–1.451 to 1.907)
–0.021
(–0.219 to 0.198)
2.03
(0.35 to 12.43)
Tocilizumab 4 mg/kg intravenously 1.93
(0.92 to 4.1)
1.81
(0.87 to 3.96)
1.8
(0.61 to 6.44)
1.31
(0.58 to 3.14)
–0.052
(–0.22 to 0.115)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg intravenously 1.48
(0.75 to 2.94)
1.25
(0.64 to 2.57)
1.18
(0.44 to 3.8)
0.54
(0.26 to 1.19)
–0.003
(–0.153 to 0.142)
Tocilizumab SC 162 mg q1w 1.63
(0.66 to 4.09)
1.3
(0.54 to 3.37)
1.37
(0.38 to 6.21)
0.49
(0.2 to 1.34)
Tocilizumab SC 162 mg q2w 1.24
(0.53 to 2.93)
1.07
(0.46 to 2.61)
1.16
(0.34 to 4.32)
0.64
(0.25 to 1.7)
–0.477
(–1.182 to 0.223)
Rituximab 1.58
(0.78 to 3.16)
1.65
(0.82 to 3.41)
1.63
(0.57 to 5)
2.32
(0.73 to 7.42)
0.048
(–0.2 to 0.3)
–0.037
(–0.276 to 0.200)
2.57
(0.38 to 18.05)
Sarilumab 150 mg 1.440
(0.76 to 2.69)
1.43
(0.77 to 2.68)
1.34
(0.54 to 3.33)
1.35
(0.73 to 2.48)
–0.01
(–0.119 to 0.098)
–0.41
(–0.828 to 0.008)
–0.65
(–1.29 to –0.01)
0.010
(–0.153 to 0.174)
1.26
(0.32 to 5.00)

Models: ACR response and DAS28<2.6 using network meta-analyses with baseline risk rREM; HAQ using CFB with REM; Van der Heijde mTSS using mean CFB with FEM; SI using RD with REM; SAEs using logit model (OR) with REM; Italic text: in favour of sarilumab 200 mg combination; roman text: two treatment options are comparable.

ACR, American College of Rheumatology; CFB, change from baseline; DAS, Disease Activity Score; DIC, deviance information criterion; FEM, fixed-effects model; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index; IR, inadequate response; MTX, methotrexate; RD, risk difference; SAEs, serious adverse events; SC, subcutaneous; SI, serious infections; csDMARD, conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; diff, difference; mTSS, modified total sharp score; rRAM, regression with random effects model.