Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 2.
Published in final edited form as: Sci Total Environ. 2015 Jul 30;536:481–488. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.080

Table 1.

Predictive performance of random forest, regression tree, linear regression, kriging models, and generalized additive model (GAM) for training and testing data sets. The random forest, regression tree, and linear regression model had the same set of 66 variables as inputs. The universal kriging and GAM adjusted for well depths.

Training Data Testing Data
Model MSE % Variation
Explained
MSE % Variation
Explained
Random forest 0.97 76.86 2.39 38.27
 OOB 2.52 39.64 - -
Regression tree 2.58 38.08 2.86 26.10
Linear regression 3.18 23.84 3.03 21.85
Generalized additive model 3.40 18.46 3.20 17.45
Ordinary kriging - - 3.17 18.20
Universal kriging - - 3.06 20.99

MSE, mean squared error; OOB, Out-of-bag data