Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 21;10(3):413–420. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12978

Table 1.

Previous studies regarding the clinical significance of 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography parameters to detect nodal metastases

Author/year No. patients (% ADC) cStage (% cStage IA) No. of occult nodal metastases (%) Cut‐off tumor SUV max Findings Accuracy
Kaseda K/2016 246 (78%) Clinical I (58%) N1: 13 (5.3%)N2: 18 (7.3%) 3.0 SUVmax, tumor size, and histology were risk factors of nodal metastases 55% (Sensitivity: 68% Specificity: 61%)
Lin JT/2016 284 (85%) Clinical I (65%) N2: 24 (8.5%) 7.3 SUVmax was risk factors of nodal metastases 77% (Sensitivity: 50% Specificity: 79%)
Nakamura H/2015 209 (72%) Clinical I ‐ III (44%) Total: 28 (11%) 3.0 SUVmax, ly, v, and pl were risk factors of nodal metastases 55% (Sensitivity: 82% Specificity: 51%)
Miyasaka Y/2014 265 (76%) Clinical I (72%) N1: 27 (10%)N2: 24 (9.0%) 10 SUVmax and consolidation to tumor ratio were risk factors of nodal metastases 77% (Sensitivity: 49% Specificity: 83%)
Li L/2013 189 (78%) Clinical I (71%) N1: 30 (16%)N2: 14 (7.4%) 4.3 SUVmax and tumor size were risk factors of nodal metastases 56% (Sensitivity: 94% Specificity: 48%)
Li S/2013 129 (83%) Clinical I (N/A) N1: 25 (11%)N2: 49 (22%) 4.0 SUVmax was a risk factor of nodal metastases 56% (Sensitivity: 72% Specificity: 48%)
Li X/2013 144 (73%) Clinical IA (100) N1: 8 (5.6%)N2: 4 (2.8%) 7.25 SUVmax of primary tumor is not associated with occult nodal metastases 69% (Sensitivity: 68% Specificity: 70%)

ADC, adenocarcinoma; ly, lymphatic invasion; N1, ipsilateral hilar nodes; N2, ipsilateral mediastinal nodes; pl, pleural invasion; SUVmax, maximum standardized uptake value; v, vascular invasion.