Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 17;2019:9730867. doi: 10.1155/2019/9730867

Table 1.

Quality assessment criteria.

Category Description
C1. Sample Are details provided about the total population who are eligible to take part during the study period in enough detail that a response rate can be calculated?
C2. Valid measure Is the measure valid for the included population, i.e., has been validated for the age and there is a valid translation available if used outside of the language it was originally developed?
C3. Purpose Is it clear what the PROM measures?
C4. Domains If the PROM is known to have domain scores, have these been accurately reported?
C5. Scoring Have details of how the total and/or domain score are interpreted?
C6. Administration Are details of the administration of the PROM included; as a minimum this needs to state the mode (interview, postal, or online)?
C7. Missing data Have statistical approaches for dealing with missing data been explicitly stated?
C8. Nonparticipants Has a comparison been made between those who participated and those who refused?