Table 1.
Effects of group, pre/post treatments, and vision on the stability during quiet and perturbed stance. Repeated measures GLM ANOVA analysis of how the quiet stance and perturbed stability were affected by main factors “group,” “pre/post” treatments, and “vision” alone and by the main factor interactions. The notation “<0.001” means that the p value is smaller than 0.001. The F values are presented within the squared parenthesis below the p values.
Group | Pre/post | Vision | Group x pre/post | Group x vision | Pre/post x vision | Group x pre/post x vision | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quiet stance | No vestibular function vs. vestibular function | 0.546 [0.4] | 0.777 [0.1] | <0.001 [61.3] | 0.883 [0.0] | 0.017 [6.2] | 0.195 [1.7] | 0.388 [0.8] |
No vestibular function vs. PREHAB | 0.169 [2.0] | 0.523 [0.4] | <0.001 [64.2] | 0.425 [0.6] | 0.147 [2.2] | 0.952 [0.0] | 0.606 [0.3] | |
Vestibular function vs. PREHAB | 0.644 [0.2] | 0.667 [0.2] | <0.001 [99.3] | 0.368 [0.8] | 0.167 [2.0] | 0.405 [0.7] | 0.253 [1.4] | |
| ||||||||
Vibratory perturbation | No vestibular function vs. vestibular function | 0.537 [0.4] | 0.479 [0.5] | <0.001 [70.3] | 0.010 [7.4] | 0.474 [0.5] | 0.181 [1.9] | 0.271 [1.3] |
No vestibular function vs. PREHAB | 0.002 [10.6] | <0.001 [20.2] | <0.001 [70.6] | 0.903 [0.0] | 0.784 [0.1] | 0.470 [0.5] | 0.654 [0.2] | |
Vestibular function vs. PREHAB | 0.100 [2.9] | 0.430 [0.6] | <0.001 [50.5] | 0.010 [7.7] | 0.406 [0.7] | 0.113 [2.7] | 0.508 [0.4] |