Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 18;2019:4826238. doi: 10.1155/2019/4826238

Table 1.

Effects of group, pre/post treatments, and vision on the stability during quiet and perturbed stance. Repeated measures GLM ANOVA analysis of how the quiet stance and perturbed stability were affected by main factors “group,” “pre/post” treatments, and “vision” alone and by the main factor interactions. The notation “<0.001” means that the p value is smaller than 0.001. The F values are presented within the squared parenthesis below the p values.

Group Pre/post Vision Group x pre/post Group x vision Pre/post x vision Group x pre/post x vision
Quiet stance No vestibular function vs. vestibular function 0.546 [0.4] 0.777 [0.1] <0.001 [61.3] 0.883 [0.0] 0.017 [6.2] 0.195 [1.7] 0.388 [0.8]
No vestibular function vs. PREHAB 0.169 [2.0] 0.523 [0.4] <0.001 [64.2] 0.425 [0.6] 0.147 [2.2] 0.952 [0.0] 0.606 [0.3]
Vestibular function vs. PREHAB 0.644 [0.2] 0.667 [0.2] <0.001 [99.3] 0.368 [0.8] 0.167 [2.0] 0.405 [0.7] 0.253 [1.4]

Vibratory perturbation No vestibular function vs. vestibular function 0.537 [0.4] 0.479 [0.5] <0.001 [70.3] 0.010 [7.4] 0.474 [0.5] 0.181 [1.9] 0.271 [1.3]
No vestibular function vs. PREHAB 0.002 [10.6] <0.001 [20.2] <0.001 [70.6] 0.903 [0.0] 0.784 [0.1] 0.470 [0.5] 0.654 [0.2]
Vestibular function vs. PREHAB 0.100 [2.9] 0.430 [0.6] <0.001 [50.5] 0.010 [7.7] 0.406 [0.7] 0.113 [2.7] 0.508 [0.4]