Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 4;2019(3):CD011121. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011121.pub2

Chan 2016.

Study characteristics
Patient sampling Patient‐informant dyads were recruited in two phases.
Phase I (screening): “participants were recruited if they were aged 60 and above, had provided informed consent, and had a suitable informant with frequent interactions for at least 10 hours.”
Phase II (validation): “participants were recruited if they had completed phase 1, provided informed consent, and had no physical disabilities that affected their ability to perform the cognitive assessments.” Participants underwent additional evaluations.
Most exclusions were due to patient choice; no other exclusion criteria were specified.
Patient characteristics and setting Patients at government‐subsidised primary healthcare settings aged over 60 years
Index tests AD‐8 Chinese and Malay translations
Target condition and reference standard(s) DSM‐IV criteria and CDR global scores used to determine presence of dementia and severity
Flow and timing There probably is a gap between Phase I and Phase II, but the duration is not specified or explained.
Comparative  
Notes All patients who made it to Phase II were included, but more than 90% of the patients found eligible for Phase I were lost.
Methodological quality
Item Authors' judgement Risk of bias Applicability concerns
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Unclear    
Was a case‐control design avoided? Unclear    
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Unclear    
    Unclear Low
DOMAIN 2: Index Test All tests
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? Yes    
If a threshold was used, was it pre‐specified? Unclear    
    Unclear Low
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Yes    
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? Yes    
    Low Low
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Unclear    
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? Unclear    
Were all patients included in the analysis? No    
    High