Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 4;2019(3):CD007868. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007868.pub3

Davies 2002.

Methods Trial design: 3‐armed, single‐blind, active‐controlled RCT
 Location: UK
 Number of centres: "examinations in 808 schools, in nine districts, throughout the North West of England." Districts include: Blackburn; Bolton; Burnley; Oldham; Salford; Skelmersdale; South Sefton; Tameside; Wigan
 Recruitment period: study commenced in 1993 (5 health districts), and 1994 (4 health districts)
Participants Inclusion criteria: not reported
 Exclusion criteria: not reported
 Baseline caries: 0 dmfs. Baseline characteristics not quantitatively reported
 Age at baseline (years): 1 year. Baseline characteristics not reported
 Sex: baseline characteristics not reported
 Any other details of important prognostic factors: background exposure to fluoride not reported. Community water supply < 0.1 ppm F
 Number randomised: 7422 (Gp A: 2488; Gp B: 2472; Gp C: 2462)
 Number evaluated: 3467 (Gp A: 1186; Gp B: 1176; Gp C: 1369)
 Attrition: 32% dropout after 5 years. Reasons for attrition: refused to participate (9%), change of residence (19%); product related and dental recommended withdrawals in high fluoride group only (0.07%)
Interventions Comparison: FT versus FTa
 Gp A (n = 2488): NaF 1450 ppm; abrasive system not reported; home use/unsupervised, daily frequency assumed
Gp B (n = 2472): NaF 440 ppm; abrasive system not reported; home use/unsupervised, daily frequency assumed
Gp C (n = 1369): no intervention control
Outcomes Primary: 5‐year dmft increment ‐ cl; prevalence of caries experience (dmft > 0). Reported at 5 years follow‐up
 Secondary: none assessed
 Assessments irrelevant to this review's scope: cost per tooth saved; cost per child saved from caries experience/extraction experience
 Follow‐up duration: 5 years
Notes Adverse effects: not reported
 Funding source: not reported
 Declarations/conflicts of interest: institutional affiliations reported only
 Data handling by review authors: aComparator group (n = 2462) receiving no intervention also reported but not considered in this review
 Other information of note: clinical (VT) caries assessments by trained, standardised, calibrated examiners. Clinical data only. Reliability values not reported
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quotes: "..randomised controlled parallel group clinical trial" and "..centrally allocated to either one of the two test groups or a control group using random number tables"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "..centrally allocated to either one of the two test groups or a control group"
Comment: centralised allocation
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "Dental examinations were conducted under blind conditions but as "off the shelf" toothpaste was delivered to the participants, subjects and their families were aware of which toothpaste they were using"
Comment: clinical assessors blinded, but participants and their families were not. Participants very young children so knowledge of intervention unlikely to influence outcome
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 1677/2472 available for examination in low fluoride group; 1696/2488 available in the high fluoride group. Total dropout rate of 32%
Comment: dropout rate mainly due to refusal to participate, change of residence; product related and dental recommended withdrawals in high fluoride group only but this number is very small. Reasons for dropouts primarily unlikely to be due to intervention
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: routine caries diagnosis. No radiographs taken; clinical examination only. Caries indices reported: mt, dmft, caries free
Baseline characteristics balanced? Unclear risk Comment: no baseline data presented. Study undertaken in deprived areas of North West of England with comparable caries prevalence in 5 year olds
Free of contamination/co‐intervention? Unclear risk Comment: contamination possible. Toothpaste supplied for use by children participating in the trial only and not to other family members