Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Lupus. 2018 Sep 17;27(12):1898–1902. doi: 10.1177/0961203318797417

Intestinal Macrophages in Mucosal Immunity and their role in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease

Fei Pan 1,*, Wei Tang 2,*, Zejun Zhou 3, Gary Gilkeson 4, Ren Lang 1,#, Wei Jiang 5,6
PMCID: PMC6398158  NIHMSID: NIHMS1503426  PMID: 30223707

Abstract

Monocytes play an important role in inducing host systemic immunity against invading pathogens and inflammatory responses. After activation, monocytes migrate to tissue sites, where they initiate both innate and adaptive immune responses, and become macrophages. Although mucosal macrophages produce inflammatory cytokines in response to pathogens, the perturbations in innate immune signaling pathway have been implicated in autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In this review, we focus on the role of human macrophages in intestinal innate immune responses, homeostasis, and SLE disease. We further discuss gender difference in the intestinal macrophages and its role in the physiology and pathogenesis of SLE.

Introduction to Intestinal Macrophages

The epithelium and the lamina propria constitute the gut mucosal barrier, and tight junctions connect epithelial cells extracellularly and intracellularly 1. The gut mucosal barrier protects the host from pathogens but allows very low levels of bacterial product translocation to the system to maintain systemic immune homeostasis, as mice raised in sterile conditions have severe immune deficiency 2. Therefore, gut epithelial cells and other immune cells have to discriminate “good” or “bad” antigens through innate and adaptive immune responses at the mucosal site.

Intestinal macrophages have poor capacities to proliferate and are shorter-lived compared to those from other tissues 3. Previous studies have revealed that intestinal macrophages are derived from constant recruitment of peripheral monocytes, which may be different from macrophages of other tissue sites 4. In humans, peripheral monocytes are defined to two or three subsets based on CD14 and CD16 expression 5: CD14+CD16+ and CD14+CD16− subsets, or classic (CD14++CD16−), intermediate (CD14++CD16+), and non-classical (CD14+CD16++) subsets 6. Whether intermediate and non-classical monocytes are derived from classical monocytes is unknown. Upon activation by toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 ligand LPS, classical monocytes are activated and become macrophages or dendritic cells (DCs), produce cytokines and migrate to the tissue sites 3. The intermediate monocytes have been reported to be involved in cardiovascular diseases 6, whereas non-classical monocytes preferentially produce pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6) in response to TLR agonists, which may be involved in autoimmune diseases 7. Due to their large numbers in the periphery and the processors of DCs, monocytes also play an important role in adaptive immune responses 8.

Macrophages play an important role in intestinal homeostasis and immunity through phagocytosis of antigens, as well as maintaining tolerance to self-antigens and innocuous antigens 8. Intestinal macrophages are neither M1 nor M2 macrophages based on their expression of high levels of MHC-II, CD163 and CD206 as well as their production of TNF-α and IL-10 8, 9. Macrophages residing in the intestine function to take up and clear antigens, produce inflammatory cytokines, inatiate adaptive immune responses and maintain homeostasis 4. Notably, human intestinal macrophages express surface CD14, HLA-DR, CD68, and some TLRs 10, which mediate recognition of pathogens, phagocytosis, and cytokine production. Moreover, intestinal macrophages express high levels of MHC-II and are professional antigen-presenting cells 10. They also play a role in modulating mucosal immune responses through cytokines (e.g., IL-10). For example, the intestinal macrophages suppress IL-17 production and induce of tolerance 11.

Innate immune responses of intestinal macrophages

TLRs recognize pathogens through pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), express in different cell types, especially highly express in antigen-presenting cells 12. Both monocytes and macrophages expresses TLR2 and TLR4, recognition receptors for diverse bacterial products 13. TLRs express in human intestinal macrophages and play a key role in innate and adaptive immune responses10. Upon a TLR recognition and activation by its ligand, TLR cell signaling pathway is triggered which results in pro-inflammatory cytokine production 14. Generally, intestinal macrophages do not produce large amount of pro-inflammatory cytokines in respond to TLR stimulation 3, 15, which may be important for maintaining tolerance and preventing uncontrolled inflammation at the intestinal mucosal site. Moreover, intestinal macrophages secrete anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 but no other TLR-mediated pro-inflammatory cytokines in response to TLR stimulation 3. Compared to monocytes, intestinal macrophages express low level of surface CD14 to limit Th17 cell development 13, 15; low level of MyD88, a key TLR signaling transcription factor; and high level of IRAK-M, a negative TLR signaling regulator to favor IL-10 production and to prevent responses to TLR agonists 10, 16. This evidence suggests a potential role of intestinal macrophages in autoimmunity. Nonetheless, human intestinal macrophages are fully phagocytic with bactericidal activity 17.

Gender differences in intestinal macrophages, implication in SLE disease

SLE is an autoimmune disease characterized by pathological autoantibodies against cellular nuclear antigens and by the formation of immune complexes that eventually lead to organ damage 18. Notably, the ratio of female to male is 9:1 in lupus disease prevalence, and the disease is triggered in most females after puberty 19. This evidence suggests that female sex hormones, especially estrogen, may have inductive effects on SLE 20. For instance, it has been shown that anti-estrogen reduces the production of immune complex and prolongs survival of lupus-prone female mice (NZB × NZW) F1 and MRL-lpr/lpr mice 21.

A good model for investigating female sex hormones in lupus disease is pregnancy. During pregnancy, peripheral monocytes in women with SLE express decreased levels of chemokine receptors CCR2, CCR5 and CXCR3, as well as alteration of the response to microbial stimuli 22. Mice intestinal macrophages express both estrogen receptor (ER-α) and ER-β 23. TLR8 has been shown as estrogen-responsive receptors in human PBMCs 24. Moreover, the ER-α expression was essentially negative while ER-β is the predominant ER subtype in the human colon by immunohistochemistry assays 25, 26. Human circulating monocytes express low to undetectable levels of both ER-α and ER-β 27. It remains unclear how estrogen regulates monocyte function in vivo, although in vitro monocytes respond to estrogen stimulation 28, 29. In contrast, progesterone and testosterone receptors are not expressed in monocytes 30. During pregnancy, fifteen to sixty percent of lupus patients have reported exacerbation of lupus disease 31. Moreover, maternal mortality rate in SLE patients is higher compared to healthy pregnant women 32, 33. Nonetheless, it is unclear whether this failure results from increased inflammation or autoantibodies in lupus patients during pregnancy.

Females have increased TLR7 responsiveness compared to males 34, 35. Previous studies from our group and others observed increased CD16-positive monocyte subsets and monocyte activation in women compared to men and in SLE patients compared to healthy controls in vivo 36. Notably, estradiol has been shown to regulate CD16 expression on monocytes in vitro, but results from these assays are controversial 37, 38. Moreover, increased CD16-positive monocytes are observed in blood during inflammatory conditions, suggesting that inflammation may drive monocytes’ differentiation from classical to non-classical in vivo 39. Different monocyte subsets show differences in TLR responsiveness, and thus, there may be a sex difference of monocytes/macrophages in the clearance of microbial products and TLR signaling pathways during inflammation 19, 20. This effect may account for the high prevalence of SLE in women.

Gaudreau et al. found that the intestinal mucosa of female SNF1 mice not only expressed higher levels of type 1 interferons, TLR7 and TLR8, but also had a larger number of IL-17-, IL-22- and IL-9-producing cells in the lamina propria compared to their male counterparts, even before puberty 40. In addition, our group observed increased proportions of non-classic monocytes, decreased proportions of classic monocytes, elevated levels of plasma sCD14 as well as reduced surface expression of CD14 on monocytes comparing women to men and lupus patients to controls 36. These data suggested a potential sex difference in macrophages activation through TLRs signaling pathway.

Recent studies showed that macrophages maintain interstitial homeostasis and induce inflammatory responses through inflammasome activation 41. Yang et al. found that ATP-induced IL-1β production was increased in macrophages of both male and female SLE patients 30. Furthermore, increased NLRP3 expression has been found in unstimulated macrophages from female SLE patients, whereas increased AIM2 expression in males and decreased AIM2 expression in females have been found in unstimulated macrophages in lupus disease 30. These results suggest that inflammasome activation in macrophages might contribute to gender difference in lupus disease.

Interestingly, a sex difference in gut microbiota may exist in SLE disease 42. Hevia et al. found that a significantly lower gut Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio was present in women with SLE even after disease remission 43. Previous studies have shown tht Firmicutes are beneficial bacteria to the host 43. Taken together, there may be a direct or indirect link between pathogen-mediated macrophage activation, sex hormones and SLE pathogenesis.

Intestinal macrophages in SLE disease

Disruption of the balance between immunity and tolerance has been linked to autoimmune diseases, such as SLE. However, little is known on the role of intestinal macrophages in SLE. Human intestinal macrophages are resistant to respond to TLR stimulation due to reduced levels of key responding molecules 16, 17. However, altered expression of type-1 interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs), HLA-DR, and Fcγ receptors (FcγRs) has been observed in monocytes/macrophages of SLE patients 44, 45. Moreover, altered inflammatory cytokine production from monocytes/macrophages also has been found in SLE patients 46.

Extensive studies have been conducted in TLR7, TLR8, and TLR9 signaling pathways in SLE disease 47. Anti-DNA and anti-RNA autoantibodies are involved in the formation of immune complex, which have the abilities to activate monocytes via TLR7/8/9 to produce inflammatory cytokines, and play a role in SLE pathogenesis 48. Furthermore, elevated monocyte counts, increased CD16 expression and IL-6 production on monocytes were found in SLE patients compared to controls 49. Plasma sCD14 and IL-6, cytokines released by monocytes in response to LPS, are increased in lupus patients relative to controls 36. These results imply that not only TLR7, TLR8, and TLR9, but also TLR4 signaling pathway may be involved in SLE disease pathogenesis. In addition, macrophages from SLE patients have impaired phagocytosis, which may result in insufficient removal of apoptotic cells and debris and result in excessive autoantigens in SLE disease 46. This impairment may be due to reduced C1q expression on macrophages because C1q is involved in clearance 50. However, the exact mechanism is unknown.

Conclusion

Macrophage-mediated maintenance of tolerance and prevention of pro-inflammatory responses to TLR ligands at the intestinal mucosal site are important for mucosal immunity. Altered TLR-mediated innate immune responses in intestinal macrophages may play a key role in SLE disease pathogenesis. Future directions might focus on the role of sex hormone in intestinal macrophage function, gut mucosal immunity, microbial translocation, and autoimmune diseases.

Acknowledgements

The funding support was from the Medical Research Service at the Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center Merit grant VA CSRD MERIT CX001211 (Gilkeson), National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases grant P60 AR062755 (Gilkeson), UL1 RR029882 (Gilkeson), BLRD MERIT (BX000470, Gilkeson), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (Grant No.7152063, Lang) and Scientific Research Common Program of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education (KM2016100250017, Lang).

References

  • 1.Groschwitz KR and Hogan SP. Intestinal barrier function: molecular regulation and disease pathogenesis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009; 124: 3–20; quiz 1–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jiang W, Lederman MM, Hunt P, et al. Plasma levels of bacterial DNA correlate with immune activation and the magnitude of immune restoration in persons with antiretroviral-treated HIV infection. J Infect Dis. 2009; 199: 1177–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bain CC and Mowat AM. Macrophages in intestinal homeostasis and inflammation. Immunol Rev. 2014; 260: 102–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ginhoux F and Jung S. Monocytes and macrophages: developmental pathways and tissue homeostasis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014; 14: 392–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cros J, Cagnard N, Woollard K, et al. Human CD14dim monocytes patrol and sense nucleic acids and viruses via TLR7 and TLR8 receptors. Immunity. 2010; 33: 375–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Funderburg NT, Zidar DA, Shive C, et al. Shared monocyte subset phenotypes in HIV-1 infection and in uninfected subjects with acute coronary syndrome. Blood. 2012; 120: 4599–608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Belge KU, Dayyani F, Horelt A, et al. The proinflammatory CD14+CD16+DR++ monocytes are a major source of TNF. J Immunol. 2002; 168: 3536–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Geissmann F, Manz MG, Jung S, Sieweke MH, Merad M and Ley K. Development of monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. Science. 2010; 327: 656–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Liang H, Duan Z, Li D, et al. Higher levels of circulating monocyte-platelet aggregates are correlated with viremia and increased sCD163 levels in HIV-1 infection. Cell Mol Immunol. 2015; 12: 435–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Davies LC, Jenkins SJ, Allen JE and Taylor PR. Tissue-resident macrophages. Nat Immunol. 2013; 14: 986–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mosser DM and Edwards JP. Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008; 8: 958–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Akira S, Takeda K and Kaisho T. Toll-like receptors: critical proteins linking innate and acquired immunity. Nat Immunol. 2001; 2: 675–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rescigno M, Lopatin U and Chieppa M. Interactions among dendritic cells, macrophages, and epithelial cells in the gut: implications for immune tolerance. Current opinion in immunology. 2008; 20: 669–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Medzhitov R Toll-like receptors and innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2001; 1: 135–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Denning TL, Wang YC, Patel SR, Williams IR and Pulendran B. Lamina propria macrophages and dendritic cells differentially induce regulatory and interleukin 17-producing T cell responses. Nat Immunol. 2007; 8: 1086–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zigmond E, Varol C, Farache J, et al. Ly6C hi monocytes in the inflamed colon give rise to proinflammatory effector cells and migratory antigen-presenting cells. Immunity. 2012; 37: 1076–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Smythies LE, Sellers M, Clements RH, et al. Human intestinal macrophages display profound inflammatory anergy despite avid phagocytic and bacteriocidal activity. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2005; 115: 66–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Guiducci C, Gong M, Xu Z, et al. TLR recognition of self nucleic acids hampers glucocorticoid activity in lupus. Nature. 2010; 465: 937–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fairweather D, Frisancho-Kiss S and Rose NR. Sex differences in autoimmune disease from a pathological perspective. Am J Pathol. 2008; 173: 600–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pennell LM, Galligan CL and Fish EN. Sex affects immunity. Journal of autoimmunity. 2012; 38: J282–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sthoeger ZM, Zinger H and Mozes E. Beneficial effects of the anti-oestrogen tamoxifen on systemic lupus erythematosus of (NZBxNZW)F1 female mice are associated with specific reduction of IgG3 autoantibodies. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2003; 62: 341–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bjorkander S, Heidari-Hamedani G, Bremme K, Gunnarsson I and Holmlund U. Peripheral monocyte expression of the chemokine receptors CCR2, CCR5 and CXCR3 is altered at parturition in healthy women and in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Scandinavian journal of immunology. 2013; 77: 200–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kawano N, Koji T, Hishikawa Y, Murase K, Murata I and Kohno S. Identification and localization of estrogen receptor alpha- and beta-positive cells in adult male and female mouse intestine at various estrogen levels. Histochem Cell Biol. 2004; 121: 399–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Young NA, Wu LC, Burd CJ, et al. Estrogen modulation of endosome-associated toll-like receptor 8: an IFNalpha-independent mechanism of sex-bias in systemic lupus erythematosus. Clinical immunology. 2014; 151: 66–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fiorelli G, Picariello L, Martineti V, Tonelli F and Brandi ML. Functional estrogen receptor beta in colon cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999; 261: 521–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Looijer-van Langen M, Hotte N, Dieleman LA, Albert E, Mulder C and Madsen KL. Estrogen receptor-beta signaling modulates epithelial barrier function. American journal of physiology Gastrointestinal and liver physiology. 2011; 300: G621–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Phiel KL, Henderson RA, Adelman SJ and Elloso MM. Differential estrogen receptor gene expression in human peripheral blood mononuclear cell populations. Immunology letters. 2005; 97: 107–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Calippe B, Douin-Echinard V, Delpy L, et al. 17Beta-estradiol promotes TLR4-triggered proinflammatory mediator production through direct estrogen receptor alpha signaling in macrophages in vivo. Journal of immunology. 2010; 185: 1169–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Harkonen PL and Vaananen HK. Monocyte-macrophage system as a target for estrogen and selective estrogen receptor modulators. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2006; 1089: 218–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yang CA, Huang ST and Chiang BL. Sex-dependent differential activation of NLRP3 and AIM2 inflammasomes in SLE macrophages. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015; 54: 324–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Adams Waldorf KM and Nelson JL. Autoimmune disease during pregnancy and the microchimerism legacy of pregnancy. Immunological investigations. 2008; 37: 631–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kiss E, Bhattoa HP, Bettembuk P, Balogh A and Szegedi G. Pregnancy in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002; 101: 129–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hahn BH. Pregnancy in Women With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Messages for the Clinician. Ann Intern Med. 2015; 163: 232–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Berghofer B, Frommer T, Haley G, Fink L, Bein G and Hackstein H. TLR7 ligands induce higher IFN-alpha production in females. J Immunol. 2006; 177: 2088–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Meier A, Chang JJ, Chan ES, et al. Sex differences in the Toll-like receptor-mediated response of plasmacytoid dendritic cells to HIV-1. Nat Med. 2009; 15: 955–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jiang W, Zhang L, Lang R, Li Z and Gilkeson G. Sex differences in monocyte activation in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). PLoS One. 2014; 9: e114589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kramer PR, Winger V and Kramer SF. 17beta-Estradiol utilizes the estrogen receptor to regulate CD16 expression in monocytes. Molecular and cellular endocrinology. 2007; 279: 16–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kramer PR, Kramer SF and Guan G. 17 beta-estradiol regulates cytokine release through modulation of CD16 expression in monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages. Arthritis and rheumatism. 2004; 50: 1967–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Fingerle G, Pforte A, Passlick B, Blumenstein M, Strobel M and Ziegler-Heitbrock HW. The novel subset of CD14+/CD16+ blood monocytes is expanded in sepsis patients. Blood. 1993; 82: 3170–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gaudreau MC, Johnson BM, Gudi R, Al-Gadban MM and Vasu C. Gender bias in lupus: does immune response initiated in the gut mucosa have a role? Clin Exp Immunol. 2015; 180: 393–407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Franchi L, Munoz-Planillo R and Nunez G. Sensing and reacting to microbes through the inflammasomes. Nat Immunol. 2012; 13: 325–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mu Q, Zhang H and Luo XM. SLE: Another Autoimmune Disorder Influenced by Microbes and Diet? Front Immunol. 2015; 6: 608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hevia A, Milani C, Lopez P, et al. Intestinal dysbiosis associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. MBio. 2014; 5: e01548–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hepburn AL, Mason JC and Davies KA. Expression of Fcgamma and complement receptors on peripheral blood monocytes in systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004; 43: 547–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lee PY, Li Y, Kumagai Y, et al. Type I interferon modulates monocyte recruitment and maturation in chronic inflammation. Am J Pathol. 2009; 175: 2023–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Li Y, Lee PY and Reeves WH. Monocyte and macrophage abnormalities in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2010; 58: 355–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Krieg AM and Vollmer J. Toll-like receptors 7, 8, and 9: linking innate immunity to autoimmunity. Immunol Rev. 2007; 220: 251–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kono DH, Haraldsson MK, Lawson BR, et al. Endosomal TLR signaling is required for anti-nucleic acid and rheumatoid factor autoantibodies in lupus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106: 12061–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Mellor-Pita S, Citores MJ, Castejon R, et al. Monocytes and T lymphocytes contribute to a predominance of interleukin 6 and interleukin 10 in systemic lupus erythematosus. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2009; 76: 261–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Galvan MD, Foreman DB, Zeng E, Tan JC and Bohlson SS. Complement component C1q regulates macrophage expression of Mer tyrosine kinase to promote clearance of apoptotic cells. J Immunol. 2012; 188: 3716–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES