Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 4.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 Mar 8;129(5):1011–1019. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.02.123

Table 2.

Average and standard deviation of intensity of perception, CEP amplitude and CEP latencies obtained in Experiment 2. The 6th column indicates the statistical results of the repeated measure ANOVA testing for differences between the different temperature steps (-5°C, -10°C, -15°C, -20°C). The last column indicates the statistical results of the paired t-test used to compare the effect of temperature slope (-10°C ; 200°C/s (3th column) vs. -10°C; 133°C/s (7th column).

Surface area (mm2) 120 120 120 120 Effect of temperature step 120
Cooling ramp (°C/s) 200 200 200 200 133
Temperature decrease (°C) 5 10 15 20 10
Duration (ms) 150 150 150 150 150
Intensity of perception 22.8 ±13.8 27.9± 16.3 29.9 ± 15 31.8 ± 15.6 p<.001 27.4 ± 16.
N1/P1 amplitude (uV) -6.0 ±3.4 -5.9± 3.4 -6.1± 4.1 -5.4± 3.9 p=.628 -5.5± 4.4
N2 amplitude (uV) -4.6 ±4.1 -5.8± 5.1 -5.4 ± 4.2 7.4± 6.0 p=.024 -6.6 ± 4.7
P2 amplitude (uV) 12.3 ±4.3 14.7± 6.6 14.2± 6.7 13.9± 8.0 p=.069 13.0 ± 5.9
N2-P2 amplitude (uV) 16.9 ±6.2 20.4± 8.1 19.6 ± 8.8 21.3 ± 10.4 p=.001 19.6 ± 8.7
N1/P1 latency (ms) 203 ± 19 197 ± 15 200 ± 19 194 ± 16 p=.461 193 ± 22
N2 latency (ms) 267 ±28 278± 33 262 ± 30 263 ± 31 p=.052 265± 35
P2 latency (ms) 405 ±56 402± 50 403 ± 59 406 ± 53 p=.791 411± 49