Table 5. Study 4 hierarchical regression analyses predicting relationship intimacy and satisfaction.
Intimacy | Satisfaction | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Predictor | ΔR2 | B | ΔR2 | B |
Step 1 | .25***a | .25*** | ||
Gender | 0.11 | -0.11 | ||
Offline self-disclosure | 0.86*** | 0.90*** | ||
Online disclosure level | -0.16 | -0.14 | ||
2 recipient prime | 0.17 | 0.20 | ||
5 recipient prime | 0.41 | 0.57 | ||
20 recipient prime | 0.36 | 0.10 | ||
25 recipient prime | -0.86* | -0.83* | ||
Step 2 | .03 | .04 | ||
Gender | 0.17 | -0.06 | ||
Offline self-disclosure | 0.87*** | 0.93*** | ||
Online disclosure level | 0.66 | 0.93 | ||
2 recipient prime | 0.51 | 0.63 | ||
5 recipient prime | 0.91 | 1.08* | ||
20 recipient prime | 0.82 | 0.89 | ||
25 recipient prime | -0.10 | 0.09 | ||
2 recipient prime*Disclosure | -0.72 | -0.89 | ||
5 recipient prime*Disclosure | -1.03 | -1.05 | ||
20 recipient prime*Disclosure | -0.93 | -1.62* | ||
25 recipient prime*Disclosure | -1.58* | -1.90* | ||
Total R2 | .28 | .29 | ||
N | 133 | 133 |
a * p < .05. ** p < .01. *** p < .001.