Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 20;9(2):e022839. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022839

Table 1.

Randomised questions corresponding to number needed to benefit, harm and inconclusive relative to threshold NNT by haematological cancer type

NNT* Haematological cancer randomised questions (n=45)
ALL
(n=24)
Lymphoma
(n=13)
AML
(n=6)
Mixed diagnoses†
(n=2)
NNTB 7 (29.2%)  0 (0%) 3 (50.0%) 1 (50.0%)
NNTB<threshold NNT 2 (28.6%)  0 (0%) 1 (33.3%) 1 (100.0%)
 NNTB lower confidence limit≥threshold NNT 2 (100.0%)  0 (0%) 1 (100.0%) 0 (0%)
NNTB>threshold 5 (71.4%)  0 (0%) 2 (66.7%) 0 (0%)
 NNTB upper confidence limit≤threshold NNT 4 (80.0%)  0 (0%) 1 (50.0%) 0 (0%)
NNTB=threshold NNT  0 (0%)  0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Inconclusive NNT 16 (66.7%) 11 (84.6%) 3 (50.0%) 1 (50.0%)
NNTH 1 (4.2%) 2 (15.4%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)

Threshold NNT corresponds to the inverse of the absolute difference (ie, delta value) as reported in the sample size calculation.

*Denominator for indented corresponds to above row.

†Mixed diagnoses refer to RCTs where more than one haematological cancer was included.

ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukaemia; AML, acute myeloid leukaemia; NNT, number needed to treat; NNTB, number needed to treat to benefit; NNTH, number needed to treat to harm; RCTs, randomised controlled trials.