Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 4;14(3):e0212867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212867

Table 5. Relative abundance of E. coli phylogroups isolated from healthy dogs living in different countries.

Phylogroup Phylogroup (%)
A 7.1 7.4 12.2 29.1
B1 53.6 25.0 58.8 35.0
B2 14.2 41.2 23.7 25.6
Da 21.4 26.4 5.3 10.3
Number of dogs 28 34 73 203
Locality Canada Japan United Kingdom Australia
Referenceb [27] [29] [30] This study

a Phylogroup E and F strains detected using the Clermont [31] method would be identified as D strains using Clermont [3].

b Published studies used the Clermont (2000) [31] method