Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 4;14(3):e0213040. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213040

Fig 3. Significantly different levels of selected metabolites (ANOVA, P ≤ .05, Tukey’s honest significant difference) in the leaves of two chickpea varieties under consortium and drought conditions at 2 time points (14 and 25 days).

Fig 3

G1: drought-sensitive chickpea genotype (Punjab Noor-2009); G2: drought-tolerant chickpea genotype (93127). Error bars represent standard errors of the mean (n = 6) at each time point. Cons = consortium, D = drought. Different letters indicate significant differences (P < .05) among treatments (consortium vs drought) for a genotype for mz/rt peak in a particular time point.